You can subscribe to this list here.
2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(75) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
(46) |
Sep
(28) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(23) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(20) |
Sep
(28) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(1) |
2004 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(14) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(43) |
Dec
(9) |
2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
2006 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
(31) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(19) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(9) |
2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(6) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(5) |
Aug
|
Sep
(23) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
|
2008 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(9) |
May
(11) |
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
(10) |
Dec
|
2009 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
|
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(26) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(41) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(5) |
2010 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(21) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(5) |
2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(9) |
2012 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(4) |
Dec
|
2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
|
2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(4) |
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(5) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Benny P. <me...@ju...> - 2014-04-29 17:09:19
|
Simon Albinsson skrev den 2014-04-29 00:51: > access /root/.pyzor > It seems like the problem is at line 93 (as per traceback) > if not os.path.exists(homedir): > os.mkdir(homedir) > while the --homedir parameter is not processed until line 102. homedir should be fixed to ~ > Am I doing something wrong or is this a bug? dont run spamassassin as root is you fault --homedir does not change uid only root can change to deprivileded user |
From: Simon A. <py...@zx...> - 2014-04-28 23:22:08
|
It seems like the --homedir parameter is not proccessed until after pyzor has already attempted to create a directory in a catalog to which it has no access. I (let spamd) run it with pyzor --homedir=/etc/mail/spamassassin/pyzor But it still attempts to access /root/.pyzor It seems like the problem is at line 93 (as per traceback) if not os.path.exists(homedir): os.mkdir(homedir) while the --homedir parameter is not processed until line 102. Am I doing something wrong or is this a bug? Full traceback: Traceback (most recent call last): [...] File "/usr/bin/pyzor", line 5, in <module> pkg_resources.run_script('pyzor==0.6.1', 'pyzor') File "build/bdist.linux-x86_64/egg/pkg_resources.py", line 528, in run_script File "build/bdist.linux-x86_64/egg/pkg_resources.py", line 1401, in run_script File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/pyzor-0.6.1-py2.7.egg/EGG-INFO/scripts/pyzor", line 340, in <module> File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/pyzor-0.6.1-py2.7.egg/EGG-INFO/scripts/pyzor", line 116, in main File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/pyzor-0.6.1-py2.7.egg/EGG-INFO/scripts/pyzor", line 93, in load_configuration OSError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/root/.pyzor' at /usr/local/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Pyzor.pm line 307. |
From: Dreas v. D. <dr...@sp...> - 2013-11-19 16:17:33
|
Hi guys, On 18-11-13 18:49, Andreas Schamanek wrote: > If that's in fact your problem I can provide further details for how > to work around it. Of course, it would be great if the servers > performed better. Spamexperts!? *hint* *hint* ;-) As that continues to be a problem, we'll be moving things over likely in the next 2 weeks to try and permanently solve that. Thanks for the feedback. Regards, Dreas |
From: Chris <cpo...@em...> - 2013-11-19 15:50:14
|
On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 18:49 +0100, Andreas Schamanek wrote: > On Fri, 15 Nov 2013, at 08:50, Chris wrote: > > > I'm seeing the above whenever SA is testing a message. However, if I > > run 'pyzor ping' I get public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') > > Are you sure that it happens _always_ when testing? "TERMINATED, > signal 15" is an error that occurs frequently with default settings > when public.pyzor.org times out. That's quite often. The 2 servers > behind public.pyzor.org both reach their limits around 08:15 UTC, > daily during the week. Only after 20:00 UTC they get back normal > operation. > I don't have exact numbers at hand but it's approximately every > third access that times out during that time. > > Moreover, on November 15, one of the 2 was completely unresponsive > for about 8 hours. > > If that's in fact your problem I can provide further details for how > to work around it. Of course, it would be great if the servers > performed better. Spamexperts!? *hint* *hint* ;-) > You're absolutely correct, it's not constant, I just hadn't noticed it before I guess and when I installed the new modem I started checking the logs more frequently to make sure everything was working correctly. Thanks for the reply Chris -- Chris KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C 31.11°N 97.89°W (Elev. 1092 ft) 09:48:11 up 6 days, 13:20, 1 user, load average: 0.42, 0.38, 0.44 Mandriva Linux 2010.2, kernel 2.6.33.7-desktop586-2mnb |
From: Andreas S. <sch...@fa...> - 2013-11-18 18:04:12
|
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013, at 08:50, Chris wrote: > I'm seeing the above whenever SA is testing a message. However, if I > run 'pyzor ping' I get public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') Are you sure that it happens _always_ when testing? "TERMINATED, signal 15" is an error that occurs frequently with default settings when public.pyzor.org times out. That's quite often. The 2 servers behind public.pyzor.org both reach their limits around 08:15 UTC, daily during the week. Only after 20:00 UTC they get back normal operation. I don't have exact numbers at hand but it's approximately every third access that times out during that time. Moreover, on November 15, one of the 2 was completely unresponsive for about 8 hours. If that's in fact your problem I can provide further details for how to work around it. Of course, it would be great if the servers performed better. Spamexperts!? *hint* *hint* ;-) -- -- Andreas :-) |
From: Chris <cpo...@em...> - 2013-11-15 14:50:19
|
I'm seeing the above whenever SA is testing a message. However, if I run 'pyzor ping' I get public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') I have just gotten a new DSL modem and it may be possible that I've gotten the firewall in it not setup correctly though if I can ping the public pyzor server it should be working. Any suggestions? Chris -- Chris KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C 31.11°N 97.89°W (Elev. 1092 ft) 08:45:44 up 2 days, 12:18, 2 users, load average: 0.32, 0.64, 0.87 Mandriva Linux 2010.2, kernel 2.6.33.7-desktop586-2mnb |
From: Matus U. - f. <uh...@fa...> - 2013-06-10 13:11:25
|
>On Sat, 8 Jun 2013, at 15:16, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > >> hmm, I have increased pyzor timeout to 20 seconds. Maybe I should >> increase it to 60 seconds, if there's 30 seconds timeout for >> wainting for one host, so the other wouldbe contactedas long? On 08.06.13 22:51, Andreas Schamanek wrote: >I am not sure I understand. What makes you think there's a 30s >timeout? The Pyzor client has a built-in timeout of 5s: I know, it's the one I have increased to 20s. I have forgotten that pyzoruses UDP protocol. TCP has usually 30s timeout, in which case TCP clients tend to switch over to alternative address. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fa... ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Linux is like a teepee: no Windows, no Gates and an apache inside... |
From: Benny P. <me...@ju...> - 2013-06-09 00:29:08
|
Andreas Schamanek skrev den 08-06-2013 22:51: > $ mv ~/.pyzor/servers ~/.pyzor/servers.bak > $ echo 127.0.0.1:24441 >~/.pyzor/servers > $ time pyzor ping > 127.0.0.1:24441 TimeoutError: > > real 0m5.030s (...) > $ mv ~/.pyzor/servers.bak ~/.pyzor/servers if we all have our own pyzord this was not a good example on downtime |
From: Andreas S. <sch...@fa...> - 2013-06-08 20:52:04
|
On Sat, 8 Jun 2013, at 15:16, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > hmm, I have increased pyzor timeout to 20 seconds. Maybe I should > increase it to 60 seconds, if there's 30 seconds timeout for > wainting for one host, so the other wouldbe contactedas long? I am not sure I understand. What makes you think there's a 30s timeout? The Pyzor client has a built-in timeout of 5s: $ mv ~/.pyzor/servers ~/.pyzor/servers.bak $ echo 127.0.0.1:24441 >~/.pyzor/servers $ time pyzor ping 127.0.0.1:24441 TimeoutError: real 0m5.030s (...) $ mv ~/.pyzor/servers.bak ~/.pyzor/servers HTH, -- -- Andreas :-) |
From: Matus U. - f. <uh...@fa...> - 2013-06-08 13:16:18
|
>> On 06.06.13 17:03, Mark Moore wrote: >> >Pyzor 24441 times out a lot when I try to ping it On 06.06.13 23:33, Andreas Schamanek wrote: >Let me guess: Exactly 50% timeouts!? ;-) >On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, at 18:54, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> I can confirm this. is there any present issue with pyzor servers? >Apparently! 1 of the 2 hosts serving public.pyzor.org is again not >answering. 79.99.133.40 was not answering for about 2 weeks. Then it >was up for 3 days, and since early 2013-06-03 it is down again :( hmm, I have increased pyzor timeout to 20 seconds. Maybe I should increase it to 60 seconds, if there's 30 seconds timeout for wainting for one host, so the other wouldbe contactedas long? -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fa... ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. I'm not interested in your website anymore. If you need cookies, bake them yourself. |
From: Andreas S. <sch...@fa...> - 2013-06-06 21:33:28
|
On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, at 18:54, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 06.06.13 17:03, Mark Moore wrote: > >Pyzor 24441 times out a lot when I try to ping it Let me guess: Exactly 50% timeouts!? ;-) > I can confirm this. is there any present issue with pyzor servers? Apparently! 1 of the 2 hosts serving public.pyzor.org is again not answering. 79.99.133.40 was not answering for about 2 weeks. Then it was up for 3 days, and since early 2013-06-03 it is down again :( Oh, just while I was writing this message, 79.99.133.40 started answering requests again. -- -- Andreas :-) |
From: Matus U. - f. <uh...@fa...> - 2013-06-06 16:54:17
|
On 06.06.13 17:03, Mark Moore wrote: >Pyzor 24441 times out a lot when I try to ping it I can confirm this. is there any present issue with pyzor servers? >LEGAL NOTICE This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential > and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom they are > addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the > originator of the message. This footer also confirms that this email > message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses. Any views > expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. can't you skip this one when posting to mailing lists? -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fa... ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. - Have you got anything without Spam in it? - Well, there's Spam egg sausage and Spam, that's not got much Spam in it. |
From: Mark M. <mm...@sp...> - 2013-06-06 16:03:39
|
Pyzor 24441 times out a lot when I try to ping it Kind Regards Mark Moore LEGAL NOTICE This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the message. This footer also confirms that this email message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. |
From: Benny P. <me...@ju...> - 2013-05-31 00:25:00
|
Andreas Schamanek skrev den 31-05-2013 00:12: > You are right, however, both servers behind public.pyzor.org were > indeed down until a few minutes ago (according to my logs): > 109.72.80.227 was down since approximately 2013-05-30 00:00 (GMT), > 79.99.133.40 was down since approximately 2013-05-15 14:30 (GMT). that reminds me of when there was talks about pyzord digest exchange to extend server farms, to be benefitted into pyzor clients to not depend on 1 server working :) i know pyzor clients can talk to multiple ip, but how does it add up in testing ? lets say one server say this diggest is whitelisted, and another server says its known spam ?, would the end results then be neotral in pyzor ? if so then whats stoping extending pyzord/pyzor problems more ? |
From: Andreas S. <sch...@fa...> - 2013-05-30 22:13:08
|
On Thu, 30 May 2013, at 23:35, Benny Pedersen wrote: > note telnet is using tcp, while pyzor using udp ? > > #telnet public.pyzor.org 24441 > pyzor ping > would be more helpfull to geeks :) > > any one please make this a big faq, i have seen this pyzor is down, > i cant telnet it :/ You are right, however, both servers behind public.pyzor.org were indeed down until a few minutes ago (according to my logs): 109.72.80.227 was down since approximately 2013-05-30 00:00 (GMT), 79.99.133.40 was down since approximately 2013-05-15 14:30 (GMT). -- -- Andreas |
From: Benny P. <me...@ju...> - 2013-05-30 21:55:35
|
Andy Lei skrev den 30-05-2013 20:30: > public.pyzor.org has been down for a long time, is there anyone > looking > at it? note telnet is using tcp, while pyzor using udp ? > > #telnet public.pyzor.org 24441 pyzor ping would be more helpfull to geeks :) any one please make this a big faq, i have seen this pyzor is down, i cant telnet it :/ |
From: Andy L. <And...@co...> - 2013-05-30 18:43:14
|
Hi guys, public.pyzor.org has been down for a long time, is there anyone looking at it? #telnet public.pyzor.org 24441 Trying 79.99.133.40... telnet: connect to address 79.99.133.40: Connection refused Trying 109.72.80.227... telnet: connect to address 109.72.80.227: Connection refused |
From: Andreas S. <sch...@fa...> - 2013-03-09 13:16:53
|
Fellow pyzors, The 2 servers behind public.pyzor.org are not responding since approximately 2013-03-08 15:00 UTC. HTH, -- -- Andreas :-) |
From: Vincent F. <vb...@uc...> - 2013-01-22 20:12:12
|
On 01/22/2013 09:16 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote: > > We are currently just doing check per the example given. > means only pyzor CLIENT ? > > Yes. We have a range of other measure in place. We run DCC here, we get feeds through Rhyolite. We also run various blacklists, and we host local copies of that data on servers running rbldnsd. So we have some experience and infrastructure that could be leveraged, but as yet I know fairly little about running Pyzor other than we are now running it in client mode on our mail routers. I would think a local-only pyzord would be inferior to using data that is shared from other sites, who might see a given spam before we do. But I suppose it's no different than running Bayes which we do local-only. Any thoughts about best direction are welcome. |
From: Benny P. <me...@ju...> - 2013-01-22 17:16:48
|
Vincent Fox skrev den 14-01-2013 22:11: > New to using Pyzor here. We have it running in test on one of > our mail routers, and wanted to know if the list had any guidance > before we put it into production on all of them. +1 > I looked back through the list archive and the recent thread I found > with this sort of question seemed to think it was OK to use public. okay, see comment below > But it didn't mention volumes, and we can be higher volume maybe > 6 million on a few days. Most days are 2-4 million. so local dns server and maybe local pyzord is ready ? or is it just pyzor (CLIENT) testing ? > We would PREFER to mirror it locally for speed and reliability if > possible. one could rewrite the pyzor CLIENT to update local pyzord on all remote servers that exists in servers list, but this step was never commited :( > Can we rsync to mirror the data? nope its dns based with udp, but if you handle so many msgs, why not get a pyzord setup from local users to report to ? > We are currently just doing check per the example given. means only pyzor CLIENT ? > Any other things we should be doing? dont know yet :=) |
From: Dreas v. D. <dr...@sp...> - 2013-01-16 10:58:26
|
Hi, On 01/14/2013 11:11 PM, Vincent Fox wrote: > I looked back through the list archive and the recent thread I found > with this sort of question seemed to think it was OK to use public. > But it didn't mention volumes, and we can be higher volume maybe > 6 million on a few days. Most days are 2-4 million. It should be fine to simply query the public pyzor server. > We would PREFER > to mirror it locally for speed and reliability if possible. Can we rsync > to mirror the data? This is currently not possible unfortunately. Greets, Dreas |
From: Vincent F. <vb...@uc...> - 2013-01-14 21:11:25
|
Hi, New to using Pyzor here. We have it running in test on one of our mail routers, and wanted to know if the list had any guidance before we put it into production on all of them. I looked back through the list archive and the recent thread I found with this sort of question seemed to think it was OK to use public. But it didn't mention volumes, and we can be higher volume maybe 6 million on a few days. Most days are 2-4 million. We would PREFER to mirror it locally for speed and reliability if possible. Can we rsync to mirror the data? We are currently just doing check per the example given. Any other things we should be doing? Thanks! |
From: Dreas v. D. <dr...@sp...> - 2012-01-17 14:16:48
|
Hi, There are no known issues with the public server currently. Regards, Dreas On 01/17/2012 02:35 PM, Antonio Gutierrez wrote: > > Hi all! > > > We are using Pyzor as Spam check on our spamassassin configuration, > > but, pyzor check is reporting that server is down. Seems that telnet > does not > > work :( > > > Trying 79.99.133.40... > > telnet: connect to address 79.99.133.40: Connection refused > > Trying 109.72.80.227... > > telnet: connect to address 109.72.80.227: Connection refused > > > Any ideas? > > > Thank you! > > > Antonio. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! > The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers > is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, > Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d > > > _______________________________________________ > pyzor-users mailing list > pyz...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pyzor-users |
From: Antonio G. <Ant...@cm...> - 2012-01-17 14:05:53
|
Oh... I am ashamed... I guess I have a mess with razor, pyzor, dcc... sorry for this silly email :_( Regards, Antonio. --- Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral IT Department e-mail: ant...@cm... Phone: +34 91 509 62 00 (ext: 161) C.M. Capital Markets Bolsa. S.V. C\Ochandiano 2 Ed.4 Centro Empresarial El Plantio 28023 Madrid - Spain Aviso de Confidencialidad: Esta transmision se entiende para uso del destinatario o la entidad a la que va dirigida y puede contener informacion confidencial o protegida por la ley. Si el lector de este mensaje no fuera el destinatario, considerese por este medio informado de que la retencion, difusion, o copia de este correo electronico esta estrictamente prohibida. Si recibe este mensaje por error, notifiquelo, por favor, al emisor inmediatamente por telefono y destruya el original. Gracias. Confidentiality Notice: This transmission is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and it may contain information that is confidential or privileged under law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the original. Thank you. >>> Benny Pedersen <me...@ju...> 1/17/2012 2:42 P.M. >>> On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:35:37 +0100, Antonio Gutierrez wrote: > but, pyzor check is reporting that server is down. Seems that telnet > does not pyzor is NOT using tcp, thats why telnet fails try pyzor ping :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d _______________________________________________ pyzor-users mailing list pyz...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pyzor-users |
From: Benny P. <me...@ju...> - 2012-01-17 13:43:07
|
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:35:37 +0100, Antonio Gutierrez wrote: > but, pyzor check is reporting that server is down. Seems that telnet > does not pyzor is NOT using tcp, thats why telnet fails try pyzor ping :) |