From: Andre W. <wo...@us...> - 2004-08-30 14:10:01
|
Hi, On 30.08.04, Andrea Riciputi wrote: > 1) Letting the default title to be the name of the function it would be > better if PyX was able to parse any Python (not TeX) valid name and > then pass it to TeX in a form that won't harm it. > > 2) It could happen that modifying a script or just commenting out some > parts of it a user (like me ;-) ends up with an empty graph key. It > shouldn't be to much effort to make PyX to take care of such an > absent-minded user ;) You're right with both points. I'll just inserted two notes to the TODO-part of the CHANGES. (Just as a remark: the first suggestion you made actually can be solved approximately only. You can always redefine the meaning of characters in TeX in an arbitrary way. That can break everything. Nevertheless I support your suggestion. Note, that we can take care of the default titles only. Everything else (that comes from the user) must be passed to a full TeX interpreter. TeX is just that complicated that we should not try to be sophisticated. That will not at all work.) André -- by _ _ _ Dr. André Wobst / \ \ / ) wo...@us..., http://www.wobsta.de/ / _ \ \/\/ / PyX - High quality PostScript figures with Python & TeX (_/ \_)_/\_/ visit http://pyx.sourceforge.net/ |