|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-04-22 19:17:28
|
Patches item #725797, was opened at 2003-04-22 21:17 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=551956&aid=725797&group_id=78018 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thomas Heller (theller) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: _exe_name_ for services does not (always) work Initial Comment: Under certain conditions, win32api.SearchPath() is called on a service's _exe_name_. This returns a tuple, not a string. Patch attached. And a feature request for _exe_args_! Can supply a patch if needed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=551956&aid=725797&group_id=78018 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-04-23 00:03:11
|
Patches item #725797, was opened at 2003-04-23 05:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=551956&aid=725797&group_id=78018 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thomas Heller (theller) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: _exe_name_ for services does not (always) work Initial Comment: Under certain conditions, win32api.SearchPath() is called on a service's _exe_name_. This returns a tuple, not a string. Patch attached. And a feature request for _exe_args_! Can supply a patch if needed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-04-23 10:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 ok, attach a patch with _exe_args and I'll apply it :) You interested in dev privs? ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=551956&aid=725797&group_id=78018 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-04-23 09:37:58
|
Patches item #725797, was opened at 2003-04-22 21:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by theller You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=551956&aid=725797&group_id=78018 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thomas Heller (theller) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: _exe_name_ for services does not (always) work Initial Comment: Under certain conditions, win32api.SearchPath() is called on a service's _exe_name_. This returns a tuple, not a string. Patch attached. And a feature request for _exe_args_! Can supply a patch if needed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Thomas Heller (theller) Date: 2003-04-23 11:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11105 Here's the patch. dev privs would certainly be nice, but you have to set up a policy. Will there be a pywin32-dev list, or where should things be discussed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-04-23 02:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 ok, attach a patch with _exe_args and I'll apply it :) You interested in dev privs? ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=551956&aid=725797&group_id=78018 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-04-23 09:39:32
|
Patches item #725797, was opened at 2003-04-22 21:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by theller You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=551956&aid=725797&group_id=78018 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thomas Heller (theller) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: _exe_name_ for services does not (always) work Initial Comment: Under certain conditions, win32api.SearchPath() is called on a service's _exe_name_. This returns a tuple, not a string. Patch attached. And a feature request for _exe_args_! Can supply a patch if needed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Thomas Heller (theller) Date: 2003-04-23 11:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11105 I cannot delete the now obsolete patch: diff.txt, please ignore (or remove yourself). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thomas Heller (theller) Date: 2003-04-23 11:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11105 Here's the patch. dev privs would certainly be nice, but you have to set up a policy. Will there be a pywin32-dev list, or where should things be discussed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-04-23 02:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 ok, attach a patch with _exe_args and I'll apply it :) You interested in dev privs? ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=551956&aid=725797&group_id=78018 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-04-24 01:32:46
|
Patches item #725797, was opened at 2003-04-23 05:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=551956&aid=725797&group_id=78018 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thomas Heller (theller) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: _exe_name_ for services does not (always) work Initial Comment: Under certain conditions, win32api.SearchPath() is called on a service's _exe_name_. This returns a tuple, not a string. Patch attached. And a feature request for _exe_args_! Can supply a patch if needed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-04-24 11:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 OK, I checked it all in. Re policy for checkins - just via patches would be fine, and when we agree you can check it in. Obvious bug fixes (like the first part of the patch) could just be checked in, but new features (like the second) should be discussed. Eventually a list would be fine. I will see if I can add you now :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thomas Heller (theller) Date: 2003-04-23 19:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11105 I cannot delete the now obsolete patch: diff.txt, please ignore (or remove yourself). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thomas Heller (theller) Date: 2003-04-23 19:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11105 Here's the patch. dev privs would certainly be nice, but you have to set up a policy. Will there be a pywin32-dev list, or where should things be discussed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-04-23 10:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 ok, attach a patch with _exe_args and I'll apply it :) You interested in dev privs? ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=551956&aid=725797&group_id=78018 |
