|
From: Jens V. <je...@zo...> - 2002-10-27 15:34:50
|
as far as compiling python-ldap goes, here is the outcome of a couple=20 experiments i did yesterday. all were done with the current CVS HEAD: - against self-compiled OpenLDAP 2.1.4 and self-compiled python 2.1.3:=20= no problem. - against built-in OpenLDAP and self-compiled python 2.1.3: no problem.=20= i specified "/usr/lib" as library_dirs and "/usr/include" as=20 include_dirs. libs was "ldap_r lber ssl crypto" (sasl did not compile -=20= could not find sasl.h, even though OS X has the library itself). - against built-in OpenLDAP and the built-in python 2.2: fails with the=20= error message that started this whole thread. the _ldap.so shared=20 module is not created because linking fails. it seems that the culprit might be the built-in python2.2. the python=20 build flags, i assume, govern the build flags used when compiling these=20= extension modules. jens On Sunday, Oct 27, 2002, at 08:12 US/Eastern, Michael Str=F6der wrote: > Michael Engelhart wrote: >> On Sunday, October 27, 2002, at 07:32 AM, Michael Str=F6der wrote: >>> Sourceforge recently added Mac OS X to their compile farm: >>> http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=3D113664 >>> Anyone interested in using that for testing python-ldap? We maybe=20 >>> could request the OpenDirectory standard package to be added to the=20= >>> compile farm system. > > > > OpenLDAP is part of the default OS X install. I guess the = developers > > would need access to the slapd.conf file to set the direcotry = manager > > name/password. > > Maybe my comment was misleading. I was only thinking about using Mac=20= > OS X's LDAP client libs to compile binaries of python-ldap for Mac OS=20= > X. > > Ciao, Michael. > |