Fwd: License (was: Re: TODO until python-ldap 2.0.0 final release)

[Jens V. <je...@zo...>]

here's my message to guido...

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Jens Vagelpohl <je...@zo...>
> Date: Fri Aug 23, 2002  09:41:37  US/Eastern
> To: gu...@zo...
> Subject: Fwd: License (was: Re: TODO until python-ldap 2.0.0 final =
release)
>
> guido,
>
> here's a non-technical question for you::
>
> as part of preparing for the next python-ldap release michael str=F6der =
has=20
> started a cleanup of all the various licenses that hang around in the=20=

> python-ldap repository. his goal is to unify everything under a single=20=

> license and the python/PSF license looks good to all those involved.
>
> now here's the hook: there is no entity that we could really name as =
the=20
> licensor. michael asked me to ask you if there are any provisions =
under=20
> which the python software foundation can assume the position of =
licensor=20
> for any non-core python packages?
>
> jens
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Jens Vagelpohl <je...@zo...>
>> Date: Fri Aug 23, 2002  09:05:28  US/Eastern
>> To: Michael Str=F6der <mi...@st...>
>> Cc: Python Developer List <pyt...@li...>
>> Subject: Re: License (was: Re: TODO until python-ldap 2.0.0 final =
release)
>>
>> that looks good.
>>
>> now, all of these licenses mention that they are between the end user =
and=20
>> some tangible entity, like the python software foundation in case of =
the=20
>> python license. what or who would that entity be for python-ldap? i =
have=20
>> a feeling there must be some "licensor" explicitly named to make this=20=

>> beast enforceable at all.
>>
>> jens
>>
>>
>> On Friday, August 23, 2002, at 08:54 , Michael Str=F6der wrote:
>>
>>> Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>>>>> How about using this one: http://www.python.org/2.0.1/license.html
>>>> which one? there's *3* separate licenses in there ;)
>>>
>>> (Sigh!) Well, how about
>>>
>>> PSF LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR PYTHON 2.2.1
>>>
>>> from http://www.python.org/2.2.1/license.html?
>>>
>>> I really wonder what module authors mean by
>>> writing "Python-style license".
>>>
>>> Ciao, Michael.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
>> cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
>> https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=3Dsourceforge1&refcode1=3Dvs3390
>> _______________________________________________
>> Python-LDAP-dev mailing list
>> Pyt...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/python-ldap-dev
>