Re: Segfault in LDAPerror() when errnum is out of bounds

[Michael S. <mi...@st...>]

Sean Burford wrote:
> 
> 2009/3/20 Michael Ströder <mi...@st...
> <mailto:mi...@st...>>
> 
>     many thanks for digging through this. Does that mean your issues with
>     syncrepl controls and l_ldap_result3() are fixed?
> 
> Yeah.  There are still mysteries, but RefreshOnly works well enough for now.
> 
> I'm wondering why controls are stripped from search results (it would be
> nice to get the control that says whether a syncrepl result is an
> add/modify or delete for example).  Is this just a side effect of
> optimisation of the usual code path?

I did not write that code. It' still mystery to me especially since I
don't like programming C. Maybe David could enlighten us. When support
for LDAPv3 controls was added I already had some doubts...

>     Any particular reason why you're using python-ldap 2.3.1 which is almost
>     two years old?
> 
> 
> It came with my distro.

Please upgrade, especially when providing patches. There have been
numerous fixes since then:

http://python-ldap.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/python-ldap/python-ldap/CHANGES?revision=1.183&view=markup

Your patch and a couple of other minor changes are now in CVS HEAD.
There should be no compability issues between 2.3.1 and a recent
python-ldap release.

Ciao, Michael.