Re: [python-control-discuss] windows no slycot

[Rene v. P. <ren...@gm...>]

Would it be an option to use anaconda? Then you can try the slycot I built
for anaconda just Monday (finally pulled this one off).

The problem is deeper than just mingw; the later lapack versions deprecated
some functions; you need lapack (at least that is the only option I have
seen binary versions for Windows for), and an updated Slycot to handle the
incompatibilities

Another option is Christoph Gohlke's python extension packages; that would
work for a regular Windows python http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/

Without slycot you are mainly limited in state-space work, and I think it
would be annoying to work around that in a course.

Success,

René

Op di 10 okt. 2017 om 18:06 schreef Ryan Krauss <rya...@gm...>:

> I am not sure if this is still the official mailing list for
> python-control or not....
>
> I am also resending this from what I think is my membership email for this
> list.
>
> I am getting ready to introduce state-space to an introductory (junior
> level) dynamic systms and control course.  We really only need the basics
> (probably just step and forced response).  Most of my students use windows
> and most of them are not great with computers.  I just tried to do "pip
> install slycot" in a windows virtual machine and received an error message
> about the lack of fortran compiler.  I can work on that, but I am pretty
> sure most of them can't handle MinGW.
>
> So, my main question is this: what will and what will not work without
> slycot for state-space simulations in python-control?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ryan
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> python-control-discuss mailing list
> pyt...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/python-control-discuss
>