From: Anthony S. <sc...@gm...> - 2012-09-21 21:01:05
|
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Francesc Alted <fa...@gm...> wrote: > On 9/21/12 10:07 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Luke Lee <dur...@gm... > > <mailto:dur...@gm...>> wrote: > > > > Hi again, > > > > I haven't been getting the updates via email so I'm attempting to > > post again to respond. > > > > Thanks everyone for the suggestions. I have a few questions: > > > > 1. What is the benefit of using the stand-alone carray project > > (https://github.com/FrancescAlted/carray) vs Pytables.carray? > > > > > > Hello Luke, > > > > carrays are in-memory, not on disk. > > Well, that was true until version 0.5 where disk persistency was > introduced. Now, carray supports both in-memory and on-disk objects, > and they work exactly in the same way. > Sorry for not being exactly up to date ;) > > -- > Francesc Alted > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Got visibility? > Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like. > Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y? > http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html > _______________________________________________ > Pytables-users mailing list > Pyt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pytables-users > |