Re: [Pyobjc-dev] Bridge Support Performances
Brought to you by:
ronaldoussoren
From: Leonardo S. <san...@gm...> - 2010-01-20 21:51:03
|
On Jan 20, 2010, at 7:45 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote: > On 20 Jan, 2010, at 12:30, Virgil Dupras wrote: > >> Hi there, >> >> I recently started to use PyObjC 2.2 (after having use 1.4 for a long >> time), mainly for 64-bit support, and the biggest problem I have with >> it is bridge support's memory usage. One of my applications which used >> to use 22mb of memory on launch when built with pyobjc 1.4 used 48mb >> when built with pyobjc 2.2. > > Ouch. Can it be that a good part of this doubling in size is just from pointers going from 32 to 64bits? -- Leonardo Santagada santagada at gmail.com |