You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(22) |
Dec
(35) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(33) |
Feb
(46) |
Mar
(56) |
Apr
(29) |
May
(56) |
Jun
(30) |
Jul
(64) |
Aug
(54) |
Sep
(86) |
Oct
(106) |
Nov
(50) |
Dec
(67) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(78) |
Feb
(98) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(95) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(103) |
Jul
(93) |
Aug
(64) |
Sep
(87) |
Oct
(93) |
Nov
(78) |
Dec
(86) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(83) |
Feb
(90) |
Mar
(64) |
Apr
(112) |
May
(103) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(101) |
Aug
(84) |
Sep
(92) |
Oct
(96) |
Nov
(86) |
Dec
(32) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(88) |
Feb
(108) |
Mar
(111) |
Apr
(107) |
May
(120) |
Jun
(134) |
Jul
(143) |
Aug
(129) |
Sep
(75) |
Oct
(171) |
Nov
(125) |
Dec
(65) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(95) |
Feb
(105) |
Mar
(114) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(87) |
Jun
(66) |
Jul
(88) |
Aug
(65) |
Sep
(71) |
Oct
(92) |
Nov
(94) |
Dec
(60) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(81) |
Feb
(84) |
Mar
(82) |
Apr
(68) |
May
(58) |
Jun
(80) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(47) |
Sep
(68) |
Oct
(92) |
Nov
(59) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(69) |
Feb
(81) |
Mar
(60) |
Apr
(34) |
May
(47) |
Jun
(65) |
Jul
(46) |
Aug
(49) |
Sep
(84) |
Oct
(43) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(30) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(62) |
Feb
(48) |
Mar
(123) |
Apr
(73) |
May
(72) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(78) |
Aug
(72) |
Sep
(99) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(112) |
Feb
(95) |
Mar
(127) |
Apr
(110) |
May
(135) |
Jun
(91) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(79) |
Sep
(136) |
Oct
(63) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(64) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(109) |
Mar
(191) |
Apr
(130) |
May
(94) |
Jun
(90) |
Jul
(89) |
Aug
(127) |
Sep
(135) |
Oct
(113) |
Nov
(136) |
Dec
(140) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(158) |
Feb
(131) |
Mar
(151) |
Apr
(88) |
May
(121) |
Jun
(85) |
Jul
(82) |
Aug
(56) |
Sep
(55) |
Oct
(125) |
Nov
(87) |
Dec
(65) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(81) |
Feb
(64) |
Mar
(90) |
Apr
(77) |
May
(80) |
Jun
(92) |
Jul
(92) |
Aug
(70) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(60) |
Nov
(99) |
Dec
(50) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(89) |
Feb
(66) |
Mar
(52) |
Apr
(70) |
May
(68) |
Jun
(44) |
Jul
(68) |
Aug
(81) |
Sep
(152) |
Oct
(106) |
Nov
(74) |
Dec
(57) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(93) |
Feb
(48) |
Mar
(60) |
Apr
(107) |
May
(82) |
Jun
(64) |
Jul
(74) |
Aug
(38) |
Sep
(49) |
Oct
(99) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(51) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(68) |
Feb
(87) |
Mar
(55) |
Apr
(90) |
May
(68) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(41) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(55) |
Nov
(24) |
Dec
(26) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(49) |
Mar
(24) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(63) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(22) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(26) |
Dec
(29) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(17) |
Feb
(21) |
Mar
(30) |
Apr
(34) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(47) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(24) |
Oct
(52) |
Nov
(21) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(22) |
May
(30) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(40) |
Aug
(48) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(26) |
Nov
(30) |
Dec
(19) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(34) |
May
(50) |
Jun
(87) |
Jul
(51) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(48) |
Nov
(32) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(31) |
Mar
(15) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(24) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(28) |
Nov
(26) |
Dec
(25) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(47) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(22) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(26) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(13) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(25) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(12) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2024 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(11) |
Jun
|
Jul
(20) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2025 |
Jan
(16) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
|
From: DeLano, W. <wa...@su...> - 2002-10-07 16:45:10
|
William, You might want to try using the "top" utility to determine whether or = not some other process is soaking up CPU while PyMOL is=20 -----Original Message----- From: William Scott [mailto:wg...@hy...] Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 7:13 PM To: pym...@li... Subject: [PyMOL] PyMol fruit-menu incompatability on OS X Hi: I've noticed that the performance of pymol on my laptop after an OS X=20 upgrade to 10.2 (and corresponding pymol 0.84 upgrade) was much worse. =20 Although I think 10.2.1 is definitely slower and more buggy than=20 10.1.5, I tracked down the main culprit: A $7 piece of shareware=20 called Fruit Menu. (It lets you put whatever you want in the=20 upper-left corner blue apple pulldown, much like OS 9 favorites). I=20 disabled something called an Application Enhancer that gets installed=20 with Fruit Menu by moving it from its original Library folder location=20 to a new one, logged out and back in again. (This temporarily disables=20 fruit menu, but it is a small price to pay). When I then log back in=20 again, pymol is significantly speedier (although I still think it=20 worked better under 10.1.5.) This is much more of a problem on my 500MHz iBook, which is what I use=20 with pymol for oral presentations, than it is with faster machines. I=20 am suspicious that this problem actually doesn't arise on dual=20 processor machines. I've also noticed that this same Application Enhancer thing screws up=20 OroborOSX, my X-windows manager. A similar cure works. Anyway I thought I would pass this along in case anyone is having=20 problems like this on 10.2.x with pymol. If anyone has a better=20 workaround, I'd like to know ... All the best, Bill Scott =20 ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ PyMOL-users mailing list PyM...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users |
|
From: DeLano, W. <wa...@su...> - 2002-10-07 16:44:07
|
Samy, Try increasing your refresh rate. You need a vertical refresh in the = 100+ Hz range to avoid flicker. If that doesn't do the trick, then = perhaps there is something wrong with the emitter? Warren -----Original Message----- From: Samy Meroueh [mailto:me...@go...] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 11:07 AM To: pym...@li... Subject: [PyMOL] hardware stereo Hello,=20 I recently purchased an ATI FIRE gl2 graphics card,=20 a nuvision emitter and glasses for 3D stereo viewing with pymol. I am currently running windows xp. When switch to hardware stereo and I put the glasses on I notice heavy flickering though I am able to see the=20 molecule in 3D. THe flickering is extermely uncomfortable and I am wondering if there is a way to get rid of it.=20 -best regards, Samy. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ PyMOL-users mailing list PyM...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users |
|
From: Samy M. <me...@go...> - 2002-10-06 18:06:54
|
Hello, I recently purchased an ATI FIRE gl2 graphics card, a nuvision emitter and glasses for 3D stereo viewing with pymol. I am currently running windows xp. When switch to hardware stereo and I put the glasses on I notice heavy flickering though I am able to see the molecule in 3D. THe flickering is extermely uncomfortable and I am wondering if there is a way to get rid of it. -best regards, Samy. |
|
From: William S. <wg...@hy...> - 2002-10-06 02:15:14
|
Hi: I've noticed that the performance of pymol on my laptop after an OS X upgrade to 10.2 (and corresponding pymol 0.84 upgrade) was much worse. Although I think 10.2.1 is definitely slower and more buggy than 10.1.5, I tracked down the main culprit: A $7 piece of shareware called Fruit Menu. (It lets you put whatever you want in the upper-left corner blue apple pulldown, much like OS 9 favorites). I disabled something called an Application Enhancer that gets installed with Fruit Menu by moving it from its original Library folder location to a new one, logged out and back in again. (This temporarily disables fruit menu, but it is a small price to pay). When I then log back in again, pymol is significantly speedier (although I still think it worked better under 10.1.5.) This is much more of a problem on my 500MHz iBook, which is what I use with pymol for oral presentations, than it is with faster machines. I am suspicious that this problem actually doesn't arise on dual processor machines. I've also noticed that this same Application Enhancer thing screws up OroborOSX, my X-windows manager. A similar cure works. Anyway I thought I would pass this along in case anyone is having problems like this on 10.2.x with pymol. If anyone has a better workaround, I'd like to know ... All the best, Bill Scott |
|
From: Warren L. D. <wa...@su...> - 2002-10-04 15:59:24
|
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Alwyn Jones wrote: > >Quadro4 900 XGL under Linux > > we now have this card running on a linux system (AMD XP1700). > > the stereo performance is stellar with a suitable high refresh > monitor, NuVision glasses and emitter. > > the only problem comes when you switch back to mono with F1. the > performance (as judged by spin, for example) then drops by ~10. There has been some discussion of this on the PyMOL list as well. All nVidia stereo-capable cards experience this problem with O and PyMOL when stereo is enabled (but not activated). I think the GLUT library is partly to blame, but the problem is specific to nVidia hardware. Presumably this is because both programs are opening a GLUT stereo window under mono mode -- nVidia's hardware or drivers have a unique problem with this configuration, which competiting options (ATI, SGI, 3DLabs) do not share. Note that this problem is not OS-dependent -- it also occurs under Windows -- and it doesn't matter which OEM manufacturer built the card -- the problem lies with nVidia chips or low-level drivers. > if you start with a mono visual (i.e. setenv STEREO OFF), performance > is again excellent. > this is the first linux stereo card that i have seen that i can recommend. I think this "bug" is a major drawback with nVidia cards. My experience has been that the FireGL2's are a better choice for stereo under Linux, with the caveat that you have to be very careful about running a version of Linux compatible with their fickle drivers. The new ATI FireGL X1 may offer the best stereo performance of any card available right now, but I haven't yet had the privilege of being able to try one. Considering the importance of stereographics to structural biology, computational chemistry, and bioinformatics, I really hope one or both manufacturers will start taking stereo support under Linux (as well as Windows) more seriously. The pharmaceutical industry as well as thousands of academic researchers have a significant amount of money to waiting to be spent on solid PC stereo-graphics solutions, if and when such solutions become available. Cheers, Warren |
|
From: Yuuki K. <ko...@co...> - 2002-10-03 12:19:48
|
I am trying to make png sequence, but it doesn't work like I wish. There're 800 pdb files in sequence, and 400-499 numbered files are made after the 800 file was made. When run script to make movie, PyMol reads 1-399, 500-800, and then 400-499. I don't know why it happens. Some module of PyMol reads the date of files to make sequence? ...I don't know. I don't like making 500-800 files to make date sequence, because it's rather big calculation. Can I make right-sequenced movie, and how? many thanks, Yuuki ---- Yuuki Komata ko...@co... |
|
From: Marc S. <mar...@mp...> - 2002-10-03 11:43:34
|
Hi Pymolers, I searched the archives for this, but found nothing (at least not under "wizard" and "density wizard"), therefore my question: I know how to load and display CCP4 and XPLOR/CNS-maps in Pymol and how to make them visible from the commandline (isomesh bla, bla, ...), but I don't understand the density wizard: If I've loaded a map, I'm not able to make some parts of it visible with the wizard, and also not if I'm trying to update an existing isomesh created at the commandline. So maybe I'm overlooking something really simple, but it did not work at all so far. Thanks in advance! I'm using Pymol 0.82 on SuSE Linux 8.0 with Python 2.2, which gives me the following (obviously not lethal) error-message on startup: [...] /usr/lib/python2.1/site-packages/pymol/modules/pymol/__init__.py:69: RuntimeWarning: Python C API version mismatch for module pcatch: This Python has API version 1011, module pcatch has version 1010. _cmd.runpymol() # only returns if we are running pretend GLUT /usr/lib/python2.1/site-packages/pymol/modules/pymol/xray.py:15: RuntimeWarnin g: Python C API version mismatch for module sglite: This Python has API version 1011, module sglite has version 1010. import sglite /usr/lib/python2.1/site-packages/pymol/modules/pymol/xray.py:15: RuntimeWarnin g: Python C API version mismatch for module ExtensionClass: This Python has API version 1011, module ExtensionClass has version 1010. import sglite OpenGL based graphics front end: GL_VENDOR: VA Linux Systems Inc. GL_RENDERER: Mesa DRI G400 20010622 AGP 1x x86 GL_VERSION: 1.2 Mesa 3.4.2 -- Bye, Marc Saric Max-Planck-Institut fuer molekulare Physiologie Otto-Hahn-Str.11 44227 Dortmund phone:0231/133-2168 |
|
From: Ezequiel H P. <za...@SL...> - 2002-10-02 23:43:08
|
Hi People, For your information, the latest Nvidia driver does not support stereo with a dual monitor (aka TwinView) configuration. It might work if you have 2 graphics cards though I haven't tried that. Does any one know if this is possible with any of the ati firegl cards? Thanks, Zac |
|
From: <pm...@ua...> - 2002-10-02 20:17:44
|
Quoting Ronald L Koder <ko...@ma...>: > I'm relatively new to PyMOL, and I've been repeatedly running into > a problem with the pdb files I use, namely that whenever I try to use the > show spheres command the program crashes. The same scripts work for > smaller proteins, so I'm guessing I need to find some way to increase the > memory allocation for the image, or something of the sort. > > Anyone have any ideas? Ronald, how much RAM do you have in your machine ?... To render 1bgy (31486 atoms) with spheres, my linux box uses more than 256 Mb of physical RAM, maybe that´s the problem (I have 512 Mb). Paulo > BTW, I'm using the win32 build and one of the files I'm having problems > with is 1BGY, (the cytochrome BC1 complex) > > Thanks, > > _____________________________________________ > Ronald L. Koder, Ph.D. > Postdoctoral Fellow > The Johnson Foundation > Dept. of Biochemistry and Biophysics > University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine > Room 1004 Stellar-Chance Bldg. > Philadelphia, PA 19104-6059 > ko...@ma... > _____________________________________________ > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > PyMOL-users mailing list > PyM...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users |
|
From: DeLano, W. <wa...@su...> - 2002-10-02 20:00:50
|
Ron, This appears to be a Windows specific problem. I can view spheres with = 1bgy.pdb just fine under Linux (albeit 168 MB of RAM...), but it blows = out on Windows. However, if you lower the sphere_quality (which only affects OpenGL = quality), it holds together: load 1bgy.pdb set sphere_quality=3D0 show sph ray My suspicion is that PyMOL is trying to allocate a larger block of RAM = than Windows can give it in order to hold the sphere graphics = primitives. Cheers, Warren -----Original Message----- From: Ronald L Koder [mailto:ko...@ma...] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:23 PM To: pym...@li... Subject: [PyMOL] spheres in very large ppdb files I'm relatively new to PyMOL, and I've been repeatedly running into a problem with the pdb files I use, namely that whenever I try to use = the show spheres command the program crashes. The same scripts work for=20 smaller proteins, so I'm guessing I need to find some way to increase = the=20 memory allocation for the image, or something of the sort. Anyone have any ideas? BTW, I'm using the win32 build and one of the files I'm having problems=20 with is 1BGY, (the cytochrome BC1 complex) Thanks, _____________________________________________ Ronald L. Koder, Ph.D. Postdoctoral Fellow The Johnson Foundation Dept. of Biochemistry and Biophysics University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine Room 1004 Stellar-Chance Bldg. Philadelphia, PA 19104-6059 ko...@ma... _____________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ PyMOL-users mailing list PyM...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users |
|
From: <ko...@ma...> - 2002-10-02 19:23:18
|
I'm relatively new to PyMOL, and I've been repeatedly running into a problem with the pdb files I use, namely that whenever I try to use the show spheres command the program crashes. The same scripts work for smaller proteins, so I'm guessing I need to find some way to increase the memory allocation for the image, or something of the sort. Anyone have any ideas? BTW, I'm using the win32 build and one of the files I'm having problems with is 1BGY, (the cytochrome BC1 complex) Thanks, _____________________________________________ Ronald L. Koder, Ph.D. Postdoctoral Fellow The Johnson Foundation Dept. of Biochemistry and Biophysics University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine Room 1004 Stellar-Chance Bldg. Philadelphia, PA 19104-6059 ko...@ma... _____________________________________________ |
|
From: <pm...@ua...> - 2002-10-02 18:53:05
|
Quoting Serge Cohen <co...@em...>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi again,
>
> I posted a question few days ago about the way to center on a particular
> zone of a structure without using the zoom command (which would touch a
> lot of view parameters at once).
Dear Serge,
I think that the following code works in the way you want - it brings the
selection to center of the screen, at the same setting it as the center of
rotation:
cmd.origin(selection)
m = cmd.get_view(0)
n = m[0:9]+(0.0,0.0)+m[11:]
cmd.set_view(n)
Regards,
Paulo
|
|
From: <pm...@ua...> - 2002-10-02 15:34:36
|
Dear Luca and Serge,
> > PS: If any one as some info on the previous questions I asked (get_view
> > blocks...), really don't fill shy about it. I did not have any answer
> > (even off list)
>
here is the meaning of the rotation matrix:
set_view (\
#rotation matrix, describes the orientation of
#the object relative to coordinate system:
-0.423272938, 0.519671082, -0.742144108,\
0.565680504, -0.488278866, -0.664524078,\
-0.707710445, -0.701090038, -0.087292627,\
#Position of the object relative to world coordinates:
0.000000000, 0.000000000, -108.510879517,\
#Coordinates of the object rotation center:
21.806344986, 33.097042084, 26.156803131,\
#Near and far clipping planes, and the orthoscopic flag:
81.724128723, 141.037658691, 0.000000000 )
Quoting Luca Jovine <luc...@ma...>:
> On Wednesday, October 2, 2002, at 10:10 AM, Serge Cohen wrote:
>
> Actually, I would also be very interested in knowing what the matrix
> output by get_view exactly means... also because it would be really nice
> if one could save the *transformed* coordinates of a molecule, so it could
> be imported into other programs in exactly the same orientation as in
> PyMOL (even though I find myself using other programs less and less,
> sometimes one still needs them...)
Here is a simple script that saves the molecule
with coordinates from the current orientation.
# Adds the command save_transformed
# Usage: save_transformed object, file
def save_transformed(object,file):
m = cmd.get_view(0)
ttt = [m[0], m[1], m[2], 0.0,
m[3], m[4], m[5], 0.0,
m[6], m[7], m[8], 0.0,
0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0]
cmd.transform_object(object,ttt)
cmd.save(file,object)
cmd.extend('save_transformed',save_transformed)
Cheers,
Paulo
|
|
From: Robert C. <rl...@k2...> - 2002-10-02 15:17:33
|
* Luca Jovine <luc...@ma...> [2002-10-02 10:53] wrote: > On Wednesday, October 2, 2002, at 10:10 AM, Serge Cohen wrote: >=20 > > PS: If any one as some info on the previous questions I asked (get_view= =20 > > blocks...), really don't fill shy about it. I did not have any answer= =20 > > (even off list) >=20 > Actually, I would also be very interested in knowing what the matrix=20 > output by get_view exactly means... also because it would be really nice= =20 > if one could save the *transformed* coordinates of a molecule, so it coul= d=20 > be imported into other programs in exactly the same orientation as in=20 > PyMOL (even though I find myself using other programs less and less,=20 > sometimes one still needs them...) Actually maybe the answer you are looking for was given back in July when Warren answered someone else's question with: * Warren L. DeLano <wa...@su...> [2002-07-07 11:13] wrote: > cmd.get_view() returns a tuple which can be passed to cmd.set_view(...) >=20 > ie.=20 >=20 > set_view (\ > -0.745493710, -0.657504320, -0.109211229,\ > 0.235591769, -0.413225234, 0.879625380,\ > -0.623487175, 0.630026162, 0.462960035,\ > 2.252975464, 1.815253615, -55.481048584,\ > -3.770999908, -6.882999897, 18.787000656,\ > 43.924808502, 75.804443359, 0.000000000 ) >=20 > or >=20 > cmd.set_view((\ > -0.745493710, -0.657504320, -0.109211229,\ > 0.235591769, -0.413225234, 0.879625380,\ > -0.623487175, 0.630026162, 0.462960035,\ > 2.252975464, 1.815253615, -55.481048584,\ > -3.770999908, -6.882999897, 18.787000656,\ > 43.924808502, 75.804443359, 0.000000000 )) >=20 > or >=20 > vu=3Dcmd.get_view() >=20 > ... >=20 > cmd.set_view(vu) >=20 > in vu[...]: >=20 > 0-8 is the 3x3 rotation matrix > 9-11 is the camera location (I think -- been a while...) > 12-14 is the origin of rotation > 15-16 are the clipping distances > and 17 is the orthoscopic flag. Hope that helps, Robert --=20 Robert L. Campbell, Ph.D. http://biophysics.med.jhmi.edu/rlc rl...@k2... phone: 410-614-6313 Research Specialist/X-ray Facility Manager HHMI/Dept. of Biophysics & Biophysical Chem., The Johns Hopkins University PGP Fingerprint: 9B49 3D3F A489 05DC B35C 8E33 F238 A8F5 F635 C0E2 |
|
From: Luca J. <luc...@ma...> - 2002-10-02 14:50:21
|
On Wednesday, October 2, 2002, at 10:10 AM, Serge Cohen wrote: > PS: If any one as some info on the previous questions I asked (get_view > blocks...), really don't fill shy about it. I did not have any answer > (even off list) Actually, I would also be very interested in knowing what the matrix output by get_view exactly means... also because it would be really nice if one could save the *transformed* coordinates of a molecule, so it could be imported into other programs in exactly the same orientation as in PyMOL (even though I find myself using other programs less and less, sometimes one still needs them...) -Luca -------------------------------------------------------- Luca Jovine, Ph.D. Department of Molecular, Cell & Developmental Biology Mount Sinai School of Medicine Annenberg Building, Room 25-18 One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029-6574, USA Voice: +1.212.241-8620 FAX: +1.509.356-2832 E-Mail: luc...@ma... W3: http://www.mssm.edu/students/jovinl02 -------------------------------------------------------- |
|
From: Robert C. <rl...@k2...> - 2002-10-02 14:41:43
|
Serge, * Serge Cohen <co...@em...> [2002-10-02 16:10] wrote: > Title says it all... >=20 > Is it possible to draw a protein (back-bone, cartoon, sticks...) with a= =20 > colouring scheme according to the crystallographic B-factor of each=20 > atoms? I have a color_b.py python script on my PyMOL web page that you can use. it has a number of options including the selection and two types of colouring schemes (rainbow versus a blue-magenta-red gradient) and two types of binning of the colours (equal number of atoms in each colour or equal spacing of colours along the B-factor range). See http://biophysics.med.jhmi.edu/rlc/work/pymol to download. There are other scripts there as well. Cheers, Robert --=20 Robert L. Campbell, Ph.D. http://biophysics.med.jhmi.edu/rlc rl...@k2... phone: 410-614-6313 Research Specialist/X-ray Facility Manager HHMI/Dept. of Biophysics & Biophysical Chem., The Johns Hopkins University PGP Fingerprint: 9B49 3D3F A489 05DC B35C 8E33 F238 A8F5 F635 C0E2 |
|
From: Serge C. <co...@em...> - 2002-10-02 14:10:44
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Title says it all... Is it possible to draw a protein (back-bone, cartoon, sticks...) with a colouring scheme according to the crystallographic B-factor of each atoms? Thanks for the help Serge. PS: If any one as some info on the previous questions I asked (get_view blocks...), really don't fill shy about it. I did not have any answer (even off list) - ---------------------------------------------------- Serge Cohen GPG Key ID: 1024D/69B1D346 - ---------------------------------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (Darwin) iD8DBQE9mv5FMygj1Wmx00YRAv+CAJ4zTpe8DPLwhXF8b5IDpCsSAQwZpgCggsfd 69I1HGciE849hCzxpv69aGo= =vdj3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Daniel J. R. <da...@ce...> - 2002-10-02 13:48:46
|
Hi Dirk Perfect, thanks. Guess it's not just my pymol understanding that's incomplete... Now.. why is the text in the top, grey window suddenly enormous in the new version? - this is a little inconvenient for get_view, for example. Daniel +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Dr Daniel John Rigden | | CENARGEN/EMBRAPA | e-mail: da...@ce... | | Parque Estacao Biologica | http://www.cenargen.embrapa.br | | PqEB - Final - Av. W3 Norte | Phone: +55 (61)448-4741 | | 70770-900, Brasilia-D.F.-BRAZIL | Fax: +55 (61)340-3658 | +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Dirk Kostrewa wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > AFAIK, rpm complains if you want to install a newer package version over an > older one. In the case of an update, just issue the command "rpm -Uhv > pymol-0.82-1.rh70.py152.i386.rpm". > > Best regards, > > Dirk. > > -- > > *************************************************************** > Dirk Kostrewa > Paul Scherrer Institut E-mail: dir...@ps... > Life Sciences, OSRA/007 Phone: +41-56-310-4722 > CH-5232 Villigen PSI Fax: +41-56-310-4556 > Switzerland Internet: http://www.sb.psi.ch > *************************************************************** > > On Wednesday 02 October 2002 14:31, Daniel John Rigden wrote: > > Hi everyone > > > > I'm trying to install version 0.82 to replace 0.78. The relevant rpms are > > pymol-0.82-1.rh70.py152.i386.rpm and pymol-0.78-3.rh70.py152.i386.rpm. > > > > However, I get a load of messages of the following type > > > > [root@dodo progs]# rpm -ivh pymol-0.82-1.rh70.py152.i386.rpm > > Preparing... ########################################### > > [100%] > > file > > /usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages/pymol/examples/package/redhat/pymol-0.78-2 > >.rh72.py21n.spec from install of pymol-0.82-1.rh70.py152 conflicts with file > > from package pymol-0.78-3.rh70.py152 file > > /usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages/pymol/modules/ExtensionClass.so from > > install of pymol-0.82-1.rh70.py152 conflicts with file from package > > pymol-0.78-3.rh70.py152 > > file /usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages/pymol/modules/_cmd.so from install > > of pymol-0.82-1.rh70.py152 conflicts with file from package > > pymol-0.78-3.rh70.py152 > > file /usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages/pymol/modules/_glu_nummodule.so from > > install of pymol-0.82-1.rh70.py152 conflicts with file from package > > pymol-0.78-3.rh70.py152 > > file /usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages/pymol/modules/_glumodule.so from > > install of pymol-0.82-1.rh70.py152 conflicts with file from package > > pymol-0.78-3.rh70.py152 > > etc etc > > > > I tried renaming the /usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages/pymol/ directory, > > but that didn't help. > > > > I believe I can force rpm to install the new stuff anyway, but is it safe > > to do so in this case? > > > > Thanks for your help > > > > Daniel > > > > > > +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > > > > | Dr Daniel John Rigden | > > | CENARGEN/EMBRAPA | e-mail: da...@ce... | > > | Parque Estacao Biologica | http://www.cenargen.embrapa.br | > > | PqEB - Final - Av. W3 Norte | Phone: +55 (61)448-4741 | > > | 70770-900, Brasilia-D.F.-BRAZIL | Fax: +55 (61)340-3658 | > > > > +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > PyMOL-users mailing list > > PyM...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users > > |
|
From: Dirk K. <dir...@ps...> - 2002-10-02 13:41:50
|
Hi Daniel, AFAIK, rpm complains if you want to install a newer package version over = an=20 older one. In the case of an update, just issue the command "rpm -Uhv=20 pymol-0.82-1.rh70.py152.i386.rpm". Best regards, Dirk. --=20 *************************************************************** Dirk Kostrewa Paul Scherrer Institut E-mail: dir...@ps... Life Sciences, OSRA/007 Phone: +41-56-310-4722 CH-5232 Villigen PSI Fax: +41-56-310-4556 Switzerland Internet: http://www.sb.psi.ch *************************************************************** On Wednesday 02 October 2002 14:31, Daniel John Rigden wrote: > Hi everyone > > I'm trying to install version 0.82 to replace 0.78. The relevant rpms = are > pymol-0.82-1.rh70.py152.i386.rpm and pymol-0.78-3.rh70.py152.i386.rpm. > > However, I get a load of messages of the following type > > [root@dodo progs]# rpm -ivh pymol-0.82-1.rh70.py152.i386.rpm > Preparing... ########################################### > [100%] > file > /usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages/pymol/examples/package/redhat/pymol-0.= 78-2 >.rh72.py21n.spec from install of pymol-0.82-1.rh70.py152 conflicts with = file > from package pymol-0.78-3.rh70.py152 file > /usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages/pymol/modules/ExtensionClass.so from > install of pymol-0.82-1.rh70.py152 conflicts with file from package > pymol-0.78-3.rh70.py152 > file /usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages/pymol/modules/_cmd.so from instal= l > of pymol-0.82-1.rh70.py152 conflicts with file from package > pymol-0.78-3.rh70.py152 > file /usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages/pymol/modules/_glu_nummodule.so f= rom > install of pymol-0.82-1.rh70.py152 conflicts with file from package > pymol-0.78-3.rh70.py152 > file /usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages/pymol/modules/_glumodule.so from > install of pymol-0.82-1.rh70.py152 conflicts with file from package > pymol-0.78-3.rh70.py152 > etc etc > > I tried renaming the /usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages/pymol/ directory, > but that didn't help. > > I believe I can force rpm to install the new stuff anyway, but is it sa= fe > to do so in this case? > > Thanks for your help > > Daniel > > > +----------------------------------------------------------------------= ---+ > > | Dr Daniel John Rigden = | > | CENARGEN/EMBRAPA | e-mail: da...@ce...= | > | Parque Estacao Biologica | http://www.cenargen.embrapa.br = | > | PqEB - Final - Av. W3 Norte | Phone: +55 (61)448-4741 = | > | 70770-900, Brasilia-D.F.-BRAZIL | Fax: +55 (61)340-3658 = | > > +----------------------------------------------------------------------= ---+ > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > PyMOL-users mailing list > PyM...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users |
|
From: Daniel J. R. <da...@ce...> - 2002-10-02 13:29:36
|
Hi everyone I'm trying to install version 0.82 to replace 0.78. The relevant rpms are pymol-0.82-1.rh70.py152.i386.rpm and pymol-0.78-3.rh70.py152.i386.rpm. However, I get a load of messages of the following type [root@dodo progs]# rpm -ivh pymol-0.82-1.rh70.py152.i386.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] file /usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages/pymol/examples/package/redhat/pymol-0.78-2.rh72.py21n.spec from install of pymol-0.82-1.rh70.py152 conflicts with file from package pymol-0.78-3.rh70.py152 file /usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages/pymol/modules/ExtensionClass.so from install of pymol-0.82-1.rh70.py152 conflicts with file from package pymol-0.78-3.rh70.py152 file /usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages/pymol/modules/_cmd.so from install of pymol-0.82-1.rh70.py152 conflicts with file from package pymol-0.78-3.rh70.py152 file /usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages/pymol/modules/_glu_nummodule.so from install of pymol-0.82-1.rh70.py152 conflicts with file from package pymol-0.78-3.rh70.py152 file /usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages/pymol/modules/_glumodule.so from install of pymol-0.82-1.rh70.py152 conflicts with file from package pymol-0.78-3.rh70.py152 etc etc I tried renaming the /usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages/pymol/ directory, but that didn't help. I believe I can force rpm to install the new stuff anyway, but is it safe to do so in this case? Thanks for your help Daniel +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Dr Daniel John Rigden | | CENARGEN/EMBRAPA | e-mail: da...@ce... | | Parque Estacao Biologica | http://www.cenargen.embrapa.br | | PqEB - Final - Av. W3 Norte | Phone: +55 (61)448-4741 | | 70770-900, Brasilia-D.F.-BRAZIL | Fax: +55 (61)340-3658 | +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
|
From: DeLano, W. <wa...@su...> - 2002-10-01 19:57:10
|
There is also a translate function similar to "rotate", the docs for = these don't exist yet, because the implementation isn't finished. = However, feel free to used them in the following forms: translate vector,object-name,state vector needs to be something like [x,y,z] translate [1,0,0],pept rotate axis,angle,object-name,state axis can be either the letter x,y,z or a 3D vector [x,y,z] rotate x,90,pept rotate [1,1,1],10,pept Cheers, Warren -----Original Message----- From: Byron Delabarre [mailto:by...@SL...] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 12:32 PM To: PyM...@li... Subject: Re: [PyMOL] translation vs rotation Mark - For the label colours, I don't think you can colour independantly. You can work around this by creating duplicate atoms, colouring them the colour you want for the labels, and then labelling the duplicate atoms. Can't help with the move objects - maybe try redefining your screen centre? I'm sure there is a better way than that however... Byron DeLaBarre Stanford PS - apologies if this showed up 3x on the list - the Mozilla mailer has = been getting fussy. Mark Pfuhl wrote: > Hello! > This is a follow up to a recent question on 'moving' several objects > independently. In the answer there is only reference to the rotate > command. But is there also a way to translate the objects > independently? I tried the move command but that does not take an > object name as an argument. I know objects can be translated > interactively by using the mouse editing mode but is there a way to = do > so in a script? > Another question: Is there a way to set the colour for labels > explicitely and independently from the object that they belong to? > thanks, > mark ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: DEDICATED SERVERS only $89! Linux or FreeBSD, FREE setup, FAST network. Get your own server=20 today at http://www.ServePath.com/indexfm.htm _______________________________________________ PyMOL-users mailing list PyM...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users |
|
From: Byron D. <by...@SL...> - 2002-10-01 19:34:58
|
Mark - For the label colours, I don't think you can colour independantly. You can work around this by creating duplicate atoms, colouring them the colour you want for the labels, and then labelling the duplicate atoms. Can't help with the move objects - maybe try redefining your screen centre? I'm sure there is a better way than that however... Byron DeLaBarre Stanford PS - apologies if this showed up 3x on the list - the Mozilla mailer has been getting fussy. Mark Pfuhl wrote: > Hello! > This is a follow up to a recent question on 'moving' several objects > independently. In the answer there is only reference to the rotate > command. But is there also a way to translate the objects > independently? I tried the move command but that does not take an > object name as an argument. I know objects can be translated > interactively by using the mouse editing mode but is there a way to do > so in a script? > Another question: Is there a way to set the colour for labels > explicitely and independently from the object that they belong to? > thanks, > mark |
|
From: Byron D. <by...@SL...> - 2002-10-01 19:27:52
|
Mark - For the label colours, I don't think you can colour independantly. You can work around this by creating duplicate atoms, colouring them the colour you want for the labels, and then labelling the duplicate atoms. Can't help with the move objects - maybe try redefining your screen centre? I'm sure there is a better way than that however... Byron DeLaBarre Stanford Mark Pfuhl wrote: > Hello! > This is a follow up to a recent question on 'moving' several objects > independently. In the answer there is only reference to the rotate > command. But is there also a way to translate the objects > independently? I tried the move command but that does not take an > object name as an argument. I know objects can be translated > interactively by using the mouse editing mode but is there a way to do > so in a script? > Another question: Is there a way to set the colour for labels > explicitely and independently from the object that they belong to? > thanks, > mark |
|
From: Byron D. <by...@SL...> - 2002-10-01 19:26:37
|
Mark - For the label colours, I don't think you can colour independantly. You can work around this by creating duplicate atoms, colouring them the colour you want for the labels, and then labelling the duplicate atoms. Can't help with the move objects - maybe try redefining your screen centre? I'm sure there is a better way than that however... Byron DeLaBarre Stanford Mark Pfuhl wrote: > Hello! > This is a follow up to a recent question on 'moving' several objects > independently. In the answer there is only reference to the rotate > command. But is there also a way to translate the objects > independently? I tried the move command but that does not take an > object name as an argument. I know objects can be translated > interactively by using the mouse editing mode but is there a way to do > so in a script? > Another question: Is there a way to set the colour for labels > explicitely and independently from the object that they belong to? > thanks, > mark |
|
From: Evan S. <st...@sa...> - 2002-10-01 13:22:10
|
I'm trying to generate the smoothest possible surface while using PyMol 0.82 under XP. I've tried increasing surface_quality but there appears to be a value above which no more polygons are generated. I've also tried playing with surface_best, surface_poor, and surface_moderate with unpredictable results. Is there an inherent limit to the smoothness of a surface in PyMol? Or, is it possible for me to get more polygons? -- Evan Stein Structural Biology Program Skirball Institute / NYU School of Medicine 540 First Avenue Lab 3-4 New York, NY 10016 phone: (212) 263-8968 fax: (212) 263-8951 email: st...@sa... URL: http://saturn.med.nyu.edu/~stein |