You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(22) |
Dec
(35) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(33) |
Feb
(46) |
Mar
(56) |
Apr
(29) |
May
(56) |
Jun
(30) |
Jul
(64) |
Aug
(54) |
Sep
(86) |
Oct
(106) |
Nov
(50) |
Dec
(67) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(78) |
Feb
(98) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(95) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(103) |
Jul
(93) |
Aug
(64) |
Sep
(87) |
Oct
(93) |
Nov
(78) |
Dec
(86) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(83) |
Feb
(90) |
Mar
(64) |
Apr
(112) |
May
(103) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(101) |
Aug
(84) |
Sep
(92) |
Oct
(96) |
Nov
(86) |
Dec
(32) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(88) |
Feb
(108) |
Mar
(111) |
Apr
(107) |
May
(120) |
Jun
(134) |
Jul
(143) |
Aug
(129) |
Sep
(75) |
Oct
(171) |
Nov
(125) |
Dec
(65) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(95) |
Feb
(105) |
Mar
(114) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(87) |
Jun
(66) |
Jul
(88) |
Aug
(65) |
Sep
(71) |
Oct
(92) |
Nov
(94) |
Dec
(60) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(81) |
Feb
(84) |
Mar
(82) |
Apr
(68) |
May
(58) |
Jun
(80) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(47) |
Sep
(68) |
Oct
(92) |
Nov
(59) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(69) |
Feb
(81) |
Mar
(60) |
Apr
(34) |
May
(47) |
Jun
(65) |
Jul
(46) |
Aug
(49) |
Sep
(84) |
Oct
(43) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(30) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(62) |
Feb
(48) |
Mar
(123) |
Apr
(73) |
May
(72) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(78) |
Aug
(72) |
Sep
(99) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(112) |
Feb
(95) |
Mar
(127) |
Apr
(110) |
May
(135) |
Jun
(91) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(79) |
Sep
(136) |
Oct
(63) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(64) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(109) |
Mar
(191) |
Apr
(130) |
May
(94) |
Jun
(90) |
Jul
(89) |
Aug
(127) |
Sep
(135) |
Oct
(113) |
Nov
(136) |
Dec
(140) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(158) |
Feb
(131) |
Mar
(151) |
Apr
(88) |
May
(121) |
Jun
(85) |
Jul
(82) |
Aug
(56) |
Sep
(55) |
Oct
(125) |
Nov
(87) |
Dec
(65) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(81) |
Feb
(64) |
Mar
(90) |
Apr
(77) |
May
(80) |
Jun
(92) |
Jul
(92) |
Aug
(70) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(60) |
Nov
(99) |
Dec
(50) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(89) |
Feb
(66) |
Mar
(52) |
Apr
(70) |
May
(68) |
Jun
(44) |
Jul
(68) |
Aug
(81) |
Sep
(152) |
Oct
(106) |
Nov
(74) |
Dec
(57) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(93) |
Feb
(48) |
Mar
(60) |
Apr
(107) |
May
(82) |
Jun
(64) |
Jul
(74) |
Aug
(38) |
Sep
(49) |
Oct
(99) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(51) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(68) |
Feb
(87) |
Mar
(55) |
Apr
(90) |
May
(68) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(41) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(55) |
Nov
(24) |
Dec
(26) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(49) |
Mar
(24) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(63) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(22) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(26) |
Dec
(29) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(17) |
Feb
(21) |
Mar
(30) |
Apr
(34) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(47) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(24) |
Oct
(52) |
Nov
(21) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(22) |
May
(30) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(40) |
Aug
(48) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(26) |
Nov
(30) |
Dec
(19) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(34) |
May
(50) |
Jun
(87) |
Jul
(51) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(48) |
Nov
(32) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(31) |
Mar
(15) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(24) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(28) |
Nov
(26) |
Dec
(25) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(47) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(22) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(26) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(13) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(25) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(12) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2024 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(11) |
Jun
|
Jul
(20) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2025 |
Jan
(16) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
|
|
From: Enrico M. <jms...@gm...> - 2022-04-29 09:14:45
|
Dear Pymol Users!
My Pymol batch script loads all pdb filles from the output directory
split states and saves the pse session
pymol "${output}"/*.pdb -c -d "
from pymol import cmd
#cmd.load('${output}/*.pdb')
cmd.set('grid_mode','1')
cmd.orient()
cmd.bg_color('white')
cmd.show('sticks', 'not polymer')
cmd.show('spheres', 'not polymer')
cmd.set('stick_radius', '0.12', 'not polymer')
cmd.set('sphere_scale', '0.20', 'not polymer')
cmd.save('${output_pse}/${project}.pse')
"
1) As you may see I load the filles using bash syntax as *.pdb. Is it
possible to do it directly in the pymol script e.g. using glob ? Could
you please show me the example of such syntax?
e.g. I''e already tried #cmd.load('${output}/*.pdb')
but it did not recognize the pattern.
2) is it possible to print the name of each separate pdb in the
splitted grid display?
Many thanks in advance!
Cheers
Enrico
|
|
From: Tereza Č. <ter...@na...> - 2022-04-27 12:33:46
|
Hello, I am trying to use the Pymol API to align some structures with the `cmd.align` command. It seems that it does not work correctly though. I have made a picture before running the `cmd.align` and after running it, the pictures look the same. Before alignment: https://pasteboard.co/1RtHTgy7iOKC.png/ [image: test_nonaligned.png] After alignment: https://pasteboard.co/ta0YVyaLbaE4.png [image: test_aligned.png] When I use the Pymol user interface on the same computer and I align the same structures, they align very well. Aligned: https://pasteboard.co/gr2hsa8whb47.png [image: aligned_structures.png] The version of Pymol I am using: pymol-2.3.4 Here is the script which I used: #!/bin/env python from pymol import cmd import os cmd.load('tps_structures/' + 'A0A140AZ69' + '.pdb') cmd.load('tps_structures/' + 'A0A140AZ72' + '.pdb') cmd.show_as('cartoon') cmd.spectrum( "resi", "rainbow", 'A0A140AZ69') cmd.spectrum( "resi", "rainbow", 'A0A140AZ72') cmd.png(os.path.join('test_nonaligned' + '.png'), 1200, 1200, 300, 1) reference = 'A0A140AZ69' cmd.align(reference, 'A0A140AZ72', cutoff=2.0, cycles=20, quiet=0) cmd.png(os.path.join('test_aligned' + '.png'), 1200, 1200, 300, 1) cmd.hide('cartoon', 'A0A140AZ69') cmd.hide('cartoon', 'A0A140AZ72') cmd.show_as('cartoon', 'A0A140AZ69') cmd.png(os.path.join('test_aligned_A0A140AZ69' + '.png'), 1200, 1200, 300, 1 ) cmd.hide('cartoon', 'A0A140AZ69') cmd.show_as('cartoon', 'A0A140AZ72') cmd.png(os.path.join('test_aligned_A0A140AZ72' + '.png'), 1200, 1200, 300, 1 ) cmd.hide('cartoon', 'A0A140AZ72') I appreciate any help on how to make the cmd.align work. Thank you Tereza -- Tereza Čalounová Charles University Faculty of Science Albertov 6, 128 43 Praha 2 www.natur.cuni.cz/en |
|
From: Thomas H. <th...@th...> - 2022-04-23 21:48:07
|
Hi JJ, This should come pretty close: set assembly set async_builds set pick_surface fetch 1ej6 spectrum chain remove not guide alter guide, vdw=4 set solvent_radius, 4 as surface Showing the surface will take a moment, about 10 seconds on my computer. See also: https://pymolwiki.org/index.php/Assembly https://pymolwiki.org/index.php/Huge_surfaces (Strategy 2) Cheers, Thomas On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 5:19 PM JJ Oliveira <joa...@gm...> wrote: > > Hi guys > > Please, how to show a full viral capsid in PyMol as seen below? > > Reovirus capsid: https://www.rcsb.org/3d-view/1EJ6 > > Thank you! > _______________________________________________ > PyMOL-users mailing list > Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/pym...@li... > Unsubscribe: https://sourceforge.net/projects/pymol/lists/pymol-users/unsubscribe |
|
From: JJ O. <joa...@gm...> - 2022-04-23 15:15:09
|
Hi guys Please, how to show a full viral capsid in PyMol as seen below? Reovirus capsid: https://www.rcsb.org/3d-view/1EJ6 Thank you! |
|
From: Mehmet G. <mg...@ku...> - 2022-04-21 12:46:42
|
I am trying to create figures showing only the ligand with electron density using an mtz file. The commands I am using to create the density map are as follows: map_double h.map select local,resn GEN isomesh map,h.map,1.0,local,carve=2.5 It works fine for one structure but I am having an issue for the others. The issue is that the density around the ligand has gaps at both ends of the molecule, instead of covering it entirely. I am attaching two figures showing the difference. Thank you in advance for your help. [image: c1_local.png][image: siso_local.png] |
|
From: Marco S. <se...@un...> - 2022-04-12 16:48:01
|
Dear Susanna, in addition to MD calculations I suggest you to perform a check on your mutated protein. Circular dichroism is a simple technique that allows to monitor the global fold of your protein. Mutating a residue may affect the folding and this seems an underestimated problem in the literature. Best, Marco Sette Il 12/04/2022 16:34, susanna pagni ha scritto: > Hello, > > I am quite new to PyMOL. I would like to assess how an amino acid change might affect the protein structure. I used the Wizard Mutagenesis to change the amino acid of interest but don’t know how I can see how the protein structure is affected by the mutation. > > Can you please help me with this? > > Many thanks in advance. > > Best wishes, > Susanna > > _______________________________________________ > PyMOL-users mailing list > Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/pym...@li... > Unsubscribe: https://sourceforge.net/projects/pymol/lists/pymol-users/unsubscribe -- Dr.Marco Sette, Ph.D. Department of Chemical Sciences and Technology University of Rome, "Tor Vergata" via della Ricerca Scientifica, 00133, Rome, Italy e-mail: se...@un... e-mail: m7...@ya... Tel.: +39-0672594424 Fax: +39-0672594328 http://stc.uniroma2.it/?page_id=622&cn-entry-slug=marco-sette Ai sensi del Regolamento (UE) 2016/679 e dei principi contenuti nelle linee guida del Garante per posta elettronica e interne (artt. 2 e 15 Cost.; Corte cost. 17 luglio 1998, n. 281 e 11 marzo 1993, n. 81; art. 49 Codice dell’amministrazione digitale) si precisa che le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio -come pure i dati esteriori delle comunicazioni e i file allegati- sono riservate e ad uso esclusivo del destinatario. Divulgazione, copia, stampa o qualunque altro uso da parte di altri non è autorizzato. Qualora il messaggio in parola Le fosse pervenuto per errore, La preghiamo di eliminarlo senza copiarlo e di non inoltrarlo a terzi, dandocene gentilmente comunicazione al seguente indirizzo e-mail pr...@un.... On the basis of “(UE) Rules 2016/679 and the codes in general guidelines of Garante for electronic and internal mail (artt. 2 e 15 Cost.; Corte cost. 17 luglio 1998, n. 281 e 11 marzo 1993, n. 81; art. 49 Codice dell’amministrazione digitale) information here contained and any attachments is confidential and intended for the recipient(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail to pr...@un.... |
|
From: Sorin D. <sor...@gm...> - 2022-04-12 14:39:51
|
Hi Susanna, As you can see, pymol allows you to mutate residues. However, in order to assess their influence, you should most likely run MD simulations on both the wild type protein and mutant(s) and compare. Kind regards, Sorin On Tue, Apr 12, 2022, 5:35 PM susanna pagni <pag...@gm...> wrote: > Hello, > > I am quite new to PyMOL. I would like to assess how an amino acid change > might affect the protein structure. I used the Wizard Mutagenesis to change > the amino acid of interest but don’t know how I can see how the protein > structure is affected by the mutation. > > Can you please help me with this? > > Many thanks in advance. > > Best wishes, > Susanna > > _______________________________________________ > PyMOL-users mailing list > Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/pym...@li... > Unsubscribe: > https://sourceforge.net/projects/pymol/lists/pymol-users/unsubscribe |
|
From: susanna p. <pag...@gm...> - 2022-04-12 14:34:51
|
Hello, I am quite new to PyMOL. I would like to assess how an amino acid change might affect the protein structure. I used the Wizard Mutagenesis to change the amino acid of interest but don’t know how I can see how the protein structure is affected by the mutation. Can you please help me with this? Many thanks in advance. Best wishes, Susanna |
|
From: Xu, Q. <qx...@an...> - 2022-04-11 13:20:43
|
Dear Colleagues This is a final reminder that the registration for the upcoming CCP4/APS school will be closed on Apr 15, 2022. Please submit your application soon if you plan to attend. Charles, Andrey, Garib and Qingping ________________________________ From: Xu, Qingping Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 10:07 AM To: CC...@JI... <CC...@JI...>; pym...@li... <pym...@li...>; phe...@ph... <phe...@ph...>; Ahrens, Kristin <ka...@an...> Subject: Virtual Annual CCP4/APS Crystallographic School (2022) in the US Dear Colleagues, We are pleased to announce the virtual annual CCP4/APS crystallographic school “From data collection to structure refinement and beyond” will be held on June 13-24, 2022 at the Advanced Photon Source (APS), Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), near Chicago, Illinois, USA. All details can be found at the school website: http://www.ccp4.ac.uk/schools/APS-2022/index.php. Dates: June 6 (Bioinformatics & setup) and June 13 through 24, 2022 (with a weekend break on June 18 and 19th) Location: Virtual/Remote The school comprises two parts: remote data collection workshop and virtual crystallographic computing workshop. Data collection workshop includes beamline training, data collection on GM/CA at APS beamlines 23ID-D and 23ID-B equipped with Pilatus3 6M and Eiger 16M detectors respectively, and data processing. For data collection, only the participants’ crystals will be used. Crystallographic computation workshop will feature many modern crystallographic software packages taught by authors and other experts. The daily schedule will be organized in three sections – lectures, tutorials, and hands-on (interactive troubleshooting of the technical difficulties the participants face in their projects). We have had considerable success resolving these problems in past years, attested by resulting publications (see http://www.ccp4.ac.uk/schools/APS-school/publications.php). A draft of the program, contact info and other details can be found at the School website. Note that for the virtual school, an additional day (June 6th, 2022) was scheduled to prepare for the main event, with lectures on generating AlphaFold models to use in later part of the school. Applicants: Graduate students, postdoctoral researchers and early-career faculty, along with commercial/industrial researchers are encouraged to apply. Only about 20 applicants will be selected for participation. Participants of the workshop are strongly encouraged to bring their own problem data sets or crystals so the problems can be addressed during data collection and/or computation workshops. Application: Application deadline is April 15th, 2022. To apply, visit https://www.ccp4.ac.uk/schools/APS-2022/application.php. Fees: There is no fee for attending the virtual school for the chosen applicants. We hope to see you at the school. Charles, Andrey, Garib and Qingping |
|
From: Lionel M. P. <lio...@ip...> - 2022-04-06 15:29:08
|
Dear all,
I encounter problems using the legacy plugin CASTp pocket loader on
PyMOL Version 2.4.1. It fails to open poc files and terminates with
"Error: unsupported file type poc". Any idea on how to solve this problem?
Thanks a lot!
With kind regards,
Lionel
--
logo-ipbs
Lionel Mourey
CNRS research Director | Team leader
+33 5 61 17 54 36 | +33 6 73 50 95 51 | Lio...@ip...
<mailto:Lio...@ip...>
UMR5089 | CNRS - UT3 | 205 Route de Narbonne BP 64182 - 31077 Toulouse
Cedex 4
ipbs.fr <https://www.ipbs.fr> | cribligand.ipbs.fr
<http://cribligand.ipbs.fr/>
@IpbsToulouse <https://twitter.com/IpbsToulouse>
ipbs.cnrs <https://www.facebook.com/IPBS.CNRS/>
|
|
From: Daniel B. <db...@ia...> - 2022-04-03 16:53:22
|
Hello, Is there a way to get “set ambient” to work on a selection? I am trying to find a way to have a single atom sphere representation appear to glow. Thank you, Dan |
|
From: EDUARDO J. A. C. <ed...@ep...> - 2022-03-31 12:09:57
|
Good Question
I like to know Too.
And about Hydrophobic interaction , Is it possible to show the
hydrophobic interactions on pymol too?
Em qui., 31 de mar. de 2022 às 06:49, Enrico Martinez <
jms...@gm...> escreveu:
> Dear Pymol users!
> Another question related to the analysis of the multi-model pdb
> obtained from protein-ligand docking calculations.
>
> I am using pymol to visualise protein-ligand interactions between each
> pose predicted by docking and protein in my script:
>
> preset.ligand_cartoon('my_pdb*',_self=cmd)
>
> then I may use the following command to switch to the state in
> multi_model pdb, which could be important:
> cmd.set('state','5','my_pdb*')
>
> Is it possible to print the number of the state which has
> 1) the maximal number of the hydrogen bonds?
> 2) has a particular hydrogen bond of my interest?
> Cheers,
> Enrico
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PyMOL-users mailing list
> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/pym...@li...
> Unsubscribe:
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/pymol/lists/pymol-users/unsubscribe
>
--
*Eduardo José Azevedo Corrêa*
Biólogo| Professor e Pesquisador
(37)9997-5771
(37)3271-4673
*www.epamig.br <http://www.epamig.br/>*
*EPAMIG Pitangui*
Rodovia BR - MG352 Km35 Zona Rural
Caixa Postal 43
CEP 35650-000 - Pitangui - MG
|
|
From: Enrico M. <jms...@gm...> - 2022-03-31 09:47:01
|
Dear Pymol users!
Another question related to the analysis of the multi-model pdb
obtained from protein-ligand docking calculations.
I am using pymol to visualise protein-ligand interactions between each
pose predicted by docking and protein in my script:
preset.ligand_cartoon('my_pdb*',_self=cmd)
then I may use the following command to switch to the state in
multi_model pdb, which could be important:
cmd.set('state','5','my_pdb*')
Is it possible to print the number of the state which has
1) the maximal number of the hydrogen bonds?
2) has a particular hydrogen bond of my interest?
Cheers,
Enrico
|
|
From: Bruce O. <bco...@gm...> - 2022-03-30 22:43:34
|
Hi! I just got output from the Yale morph server *http://morph2.molmovdb.org/submit.html <http://morph2.molmovdb.org/submit.html>* that allows construction of movies given structures of protein conformers. I opened the result in PyMol and see all the scenes displayed at the same time. Does anyone have experience creating a movie from their output? Thx! Bruce |
|
From: Enrico M. <jms...@gm...> - 2022-03-29 14:49:11
|
just as an update of my first topic. Is there any possibility to associate any plugin or external tool (rdkit) to calculate pharmacophore model for each docking pose loaded in multi-model format (i) as well as for the ligand in X-ray structure (ii) and then compare i with ii in order to find instantly the docking pose which is more similar to X-ray structure according to some part of the pharmacophore shared between the both molecules ? чт, 24 мар. 2022 г. в 14:11, Enrico Martinez <jms...@gm...>: > > Dear Pymol Users! > I am dealing with the analysis of the results of protein-ligand > docking poses representing the multi-model pdb. I need to find a > possibility (e.g. via some script that could be executed in the pymol) > to compare each docking pose with the X-ray structure (loaded as the > separate model in pymol) in order to find automatically the model (= > docking solution) which may fit better to it (e.g. via estimating RMSD > of some part of the ligand in each docking solution compared to the > X-ray structure). > > Assuming that the both pdbs ((docking poses, and X-ray structure)) > have been superimposed (based on the protein atoms) how could I > automatically switch to the model (in the ensemble) with the identical > position of the ligand as in the X-ray structure? I would be grateful > for any suggestions > With kind regards, > Enrico |
|
From: Jared S. <jar...@co...> - 2022-03-25 18:20:40
|
Hi Wei -
Fun problem! Not a "smart" way to do it, but I think functional, using
pseudoatoms and orient to set the view angle:
```
# Create an origin pseudoatom
ori_coords = [0.4017522, 23.15367207, 6.68992345]
cmd.pseudoatom("ori", pos=ori_coords)
color red, ori
show nb_spheres, ori
# Second pseudoatom as a stand-in for the camera
axis = [0.74, 0.18, -0.65]
cam_coords = [sum(x) for x in zip(ori_coords, axis)]
cmd.pseudoatom("cam", pos=cam_coords)
# Adjust the view so the sphere is centered and crosshairs are aligned on
camera Z axis
orient
center ori
turn y, -90
# Print the current view matrix
get_view
```
yields
```
set_view (\
-0.673201025, 0.023786053, 0.739076912,\
0.231151611, 0.956164062, 0.179775774,\
-0.702402592, 0.291863978, -0.649188757,\
0.000000000, 0.000000000, -14.178204536,\
0.401752204, 23.153671265, 6.689923286,\
11.178205490, 17.178203583, -20.000000000 )
```
[image: image.png]
Hope that helps.
Cheers,
Jared
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 12:44 PM Wei Wang <ww...@co...> wrote:
> Dear PyMOL community,
>
> I have a need to adjust my view point in python script. I want to achieve
> the following:
>
> 1. I have a origin with coordinates [ 0.4017522 23.15367207 6.68992345]
> 2. I have a vector/rotation axis [0.74, 0.18, -0.65]
> 3. I want to look directly down that vector using above origin.
>
> Theoretically I should be able to use those information to determine the
> values needed to put in set_view. However, I’m not smart enough to do that.
> Would anyone please show me the way?
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Wei
> _______________________________________________
> PyMOL-users mailing list
> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/pym...@li...
> Unsubscribe:
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/pymol/lists/pymol-users/unsubscribe
|
|
From: Wei W. <ww...@co...> - 2022-03-25 16:43:07
|
Dear PyMOL community, I have a need to adjust my view point in python script. I want to achieve the following: 1. I have a origin with coordinates [ 0.4017522 23.15367207 6.68992345] 2. I have a vector/rotation axis [0.74, 0.18, -0.65] 3. I want to look directly down that vector using above origin. Theoretically I should be able to use those information to determine the values needed to put in set_view. However, I’m not smart enough to do that. Would anyone please show me the way? Many thanks, Wei |
|
From: Enrico M. <jms...@gm...> - 2022-03-25 09:48:04
|
Hello Joel, Actually I am using VINA that indeed provides us with these RMSD values. However the goal is to compare the docking poses with the X-ray structure containing another (but very similar in terms of the functional groups) ligand. I've already tried some pymol built-in commands like pair_fit but I could not adapt it to the multi-model pdb in order to select "on-the-fly" the pose which has better similarity to the pose observed in the X-ray structure. Cheers, Enrico пт, 25 мар. 2022 г. в 01:28, Joel Tyndall <joe...@ot...>: > > Hi Enrico, > > Which docking protocol are you using as this may already have RMSD to a reference ligand and presentation of best poses (based on scoring) > > Joel > > -----Original Message----- > From: Enrico Martinez <jms...@gm...> > Sent: Friday, 25 March 2022 2:11 AM > To: pymol-users <pym...@li...> > Subject: [PyMOL] Analysis of docking results in multi-model format > > Dear Pymol Users! > I am dealing with the analysis of the results of protein-ligand docking poses representing the multi-model pdb. I need to find a possibility (e.g. via some script that could be executed in the pymol) to compare each docking pose with the X-ray structure (loaded as the separate model in pymol) in order to find automatically the model (= docking solution) which may fit better to it (e.g. via estimating RMSD of some part of the ligand in each docking solution compared to the X-ray structure). > > Assuming that the both pdbs ((docking poses, and X-ray structure)) have been superimposed (based on the protein atoms) how could I automatically switch to the model (in the ensemble) with the identical position of the ligand as in the X-ray structure? I would be grateful for any suggestions With kind regards, Enrico > > > _______________________________________________ > PyMOL-users mailing list > Archives: https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mail-archive.com%2Fpymol-users%40lists.sourceforge.net&data=04%7C01%7Cjoel.tyndall%40otago.ac.nz%7C5801f6d4300c4429df4008da0d996aa8%7C0225efc578fe4928b1579ef24809e9ba%7C0%7C0%7C637837249971556989%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=%2FH4rWyrcccM8UDMCjpXhzfhvbWIRK7iVxT3WTHhd11Q%3D&reserved=0 > Unsubscribe: https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsourceforge.net%2Fprojects%2Fpymol%2Flists%2Fpymol-users%2Funsubscribe&data=04%7C01%7Cjoel.tyndall%40otago.ac.nz%7C5801f6d4300c4429df4008da0d996aa8%7C0225efc578fe4928b1579ef24809e9ba%7C0%7C0%7C637837249971556989%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=W1bYxrtg1zExUmoFtA3srAUsOc8PAODG2QimqwEY%2FQw%3D&reserved=0 |
|
From: Joel T. <joe...@ot...> - 2022-03-25 00:43:08
|
Hi Enrico, Which docking protocol are you using as this may already have RMSD to a reference ligand and presentation of best poses (based on scoring) Joel -----Original Message----- From: Enrico Martinez <jms...@gm...> Sent: Friday, 25 March 2022 2:11 AM To: pymol-users <pym...@li...> Subject: [PyMOL] Analysis of docking results in multi-model format Dear Pymol Users! I am dealing with the analysis of the results of protein-ligand docking poses representing the multi-model pdb. I need to find a possibility (e.g. via some script that could be executed in the pymol) to compare each docking pose with the X-ray structure (loaded as the separate model in pymol) in order to find automatically the model (= docking solution) which may fit better to it (e.g. via estimating RMSD of some part of the ligand in each docking solution compared to the X-ray structure). Assuming that the both pdbs ((docking poses, and X-ray structure)) have been superimposed (based on the protein atoms) how could I automatically switch to the model (in the ensemble) with the identical position of the ligand as in the X-ray structure? I would be grateful for any suggestions With kind regards, Enrico _______________________________________________ PyMOL-users mailing list Archives: https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mail-archive.com%2Fpymol-users%40lists.sourceforge.net&data=04%7C01%7Cjoel.tyndall%40otago.ac.nz%7C5801f6d4300c4429df4008da0d996aa8%7C0225efc578fe4928b1579ef24809e9ba%7C0%7C0%7C637837249971556989%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=%2FH4rWyrcccM8UDMCjpXhzfhvbWIRK7iVxT3WTHhd11Q%3D&reserved=0 Unsubscribe: https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsourceforge.net%2Fprojects%2Fpymol%2Flists%2Fpymol-users%2Funsubscribe&data=04%7C01%7Cjoel.tyndall%40otago.ac.nz%7C5801f6d4300c4429df4008da0d996aa8%7C0225efc578fe4928b1579ef24809e9ba%7C0%7C0%7C637837249971556989%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=W1bYxrtg1zExUmoFtA3srAUsOc8PAODG2QimqwEY%2FQw%3D&reserved=0 |
|
From: Enrico M. <jms...@gm...> - 2022-03-24 13:11:47
|
Dear Pymol Users! I am dealing with the analysis of the results of protein-ligand docking poses representing the multi-model pdb. I need to find a possibility (e.g. via some script that could be executed in the pymol) to compare each docking pose with the X-ray structure (loaded as the separate model in pymol) in order to find automatically the model (= docking solution) which may fit better to it (e.g. via estimating RMSD of some part of the ligand in each docking solution compared to the X-ray structure). Assuming that the both pdbs ((docking poses, and X-ray structure)) have been superimposed (based on the protein atoms) how could I automatically switch to the model (in the ensemble) with the identical position of the ligand as in the X-ray structure? I would be grateful for any suggestions With kind regards, Enrico |
|
From: Enrico M. <jms...@gm...> - 2022-03-22 16:45:48
|
Dear Pymol Users!
I am dealing with the multi-model pdb containing the docking poses
that were merged with the protein atoms. Initially the part containing
the ligand poses also included some flexible side-chains of the
receptor (obtained from VINA) that were subsequently merged ( in each
model) with the static part of the protein using some script.
The complex may be correctly visualised in pymol, however (due to the
reorganizations of the atoms in the protein part) there are some
problems in the visualisations of the interatomic interactions between
the static part of the protein and the ligands.
May we use some pymol in no-gui mode to "fix" the atomic order problem
in the loaded pdb (in each models!) and then save it as a new pdb?
Here is the model of the workflow:
pymol -c -d "
from pymol import cmddb')
cmd.load('complex.pdb')
# execute some command to fix atom order in the multi-model pdb
cmd.save('complex_fixed_pdb.pdb')
"
|
|
From: <tna...@os...> - 2022-03-22 05:17:10
|
Hi, You have to predict how six monomers assemble into a hexamer. This can be done by AlphaFold multimer or ColabFold notebook. Best regards, Takanori Nakane ________________________________________ 差出人: vivek ambastha <vi...@mi...> 送信日時: 2022年3月22日 12:56 宛先: pym...@li... 件名: [PyMOL] pymol cartoon for hexamer Hello all, I am naïve to pymol or even protein structure. I need help in creating the hexameric model of a protein whose structure is in predicted through alpha folds. I can download the monomer. My objective is to develop a cartoon for the hexamer using these six individual monomers. Is this possible using Pymol? If yes then how to do that Best, Vivek.A |
|
From: vivek a. <vi...@mi...> - 2022-03-22 04:16:00
|
Hello all, I am naïve to pymol or even protein structure. I need help in creating the hexameric model of a protein whose structure is in predicted through alpha folds. I can download the monomer. My objective is to develop a cartoon for the hexamer using these six individual monomers. Is this possible using Pymol? If yes then how to do that Best, Vivek.A |
|
From: Mcguire, K. <klm...@UC...> - 2022-03-17 02:17:18
|
I have been using VMD for most of my MD analysis, but I am trying to learn PyMol now. I know how to load a pdb and a dcd onto that pdb. But how do I measure the RMSD of each frame in the DCD aligned to the starting structure, and then output a graph like of RMSD vs frame? Doing this through scripting would be great. Thanks! |
|
From: Thomas H. <th...@th...> - 2022-03-16 18:18:41
|
Hi Nicholas, You can use the "split_states" command. https://pymolwiki.org/index.php/Split_states Cheers, Thomas On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 6:57 AM Nicholas Gao <dom...@gm...> wrote: > > Dear PyMOL users, > > I have an antibody-antigen structure where the authors have put the antigen atoms in state 1 and put the antibody atoms in state 2. Is there a good way via command line to collapse state 1 and 2 into a single state, where both antibody and antigen atoms are viewable together? > > Sincerely, > Nicholas Gao > _______________________________________________ > PyMOL-users mailing list > Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/pym...@li... > Unsubscribe: https://sourceforge.net/projects/pymol/lists/pymol-users/unsubscribe |