From: wtempel <wt...@gm...> - 2017-12-07 19:07:04
|
Thomas, how did you know? I removed the --whitespace switch, and get a meaningful model displayed in PyMOL. Has the mmcif format been suggested to the PDB2PQR developers? Many thanks. Wolfram On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 3:01 AM, Thomas Holder <tho...@sc... > wrote: > Hi Wolfram, > > Do you run pdb2pqr with the --whitespace option? If yes, remove that and > see if PyMOL is happy with the output. > > Some versions of PyMOL's APBS Tools plugin have the --whitespace option by > default (first page, "pdb2pqr command line options") but it seems that this > flag creates about as many problems as it solves. The correct solution > would be to retire the PQR format and replace it with mmCIF, which is not a > fixed column format. > > Cheers, > Thomas > > > On Dec 7, 2017, at 1:14 AM, wtempel <wt...@gm...> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > loading a pqr (PDB2PQR version 2.1.1) file into pymol 1.7 … 1.9 garbles > the model in some systematic way, whereas PDB2PQR version 1.8 output > appears to be displayed correctly. After superficial inspection I concluded > that in 2.1.1 output, columns from (and including) the atom number appear > to be shifted to the right by one position. Indeed, when I apply > > sed 's/^ATOM /ATOM/', the so modified 2.1.1 output appears to be > displayed correctly in PyMOL. My question to those familiar with pqr models > and the pymol source: is the sed hack safe as in that it would not distort > any subsequently calculated APBS surfaces? > > Best regards. > > Wolfram Tempel > > -- > Thomas Holder > PyMOL Principal Developer > Schrödinger, Inc. > > |