Re: [pygccxml-development] Help with single header setup
Brought to you by:
mbaas,
roman_yakovenko
From: Roman Y. <rom...@gm...> - 2009-08-01 06:11:26
|
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 12:47 AM, Brendan Duncan<Bre...@di...> wrote: > Thanks Roman, this helps me out. > > Interesting. I would like to investigate the problem. Is this an open > source project? > > > Unfortunately the project is proprietary in-house software. Using the > single header rather than passing all of the headers to module_builder seems > to solve the memory issue. Okey. Now I understand the reasons. > Now I just have to solve the multi-module dependency errors that have > started to show up, although I didn't get them when I was using the method > of passing all headers individually. I'll be sure to ask more questions if > I hit another roadblock. Did you see the following document: http://language-binding.net/pyplusplus/documentation/multi_module_development.html That functionality was tested by many projects and it worked ( for them :-) ). > The Py++ project is quite nice, by the way. Thanks for providing it, and > offering help. Thank you! -- Roman Yakovenko C++ Python language binding http://www.language-binding.net/ |