#59 Matju's beautifications (untested)

wishlist
closed
nobody
5
2006-11-01
2005-11-30
No

Hey all,
here's Matju's changes to the devel_0_39 codebase.

There's a bug inside m_class.c, function pd_typedmess,
where the break is missing at the end of the A_DEFSYM
case, just before default.

greetings,
Thomas

Discussion

  • Thomas Grill

    Thomas Grill - 2005-11-30

    Patch to devel_0_39 src folder

     
  • Thomas Grill

    Thomas Grill - 2005-11-30

    patch to devel_0_39 extra folder

     
  • Thomas Grill

    Thomas Grill - 2005-11-30

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=350252

    there are also changes to extra. see the matju-extra.patch

     
  • Hans-Christoph Steiner

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=27104

    this has been here for a long while with no activity, so I
    am setting it to Pending. It'll be automatically set to
    closed after a while if no one tends to it.

     
  • Hans-Christoph Steiner

    • status: open --> pending
     
  • Anonymous - 2006-10-26

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=801174

    Those changes were rejected from devel_0_39 ("uncommitted"
    aka reverted) on the grounds that it would make it more
    difficult to make devel_0_40 (that is, merge miller's 0.40
    into devel_0_39), supposing that Miller would reject those
    changes, and that those changes are merely "cosmetic".

    In releasing pd 0.40 as it is released, Miller demonstrates
    zero interest in something as simple and useful as removing
    unused variables.

    That's why I didn't push that patch any further.

     
  • SourceForge Robot

    • status: pending --> closed
     
  • SourceForge Robot

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=1312539

    This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was
    previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter
    did not respond within 14 days (the time period specified by
    the administrator of this Tracker).

     


Anonymous

Cancel  Add attachments





Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.

Sign up for the SourceForge newsletter:





No, thanks