#154 [list-len] uses [list length], which doesn't exist in 0.39

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

In Pd-0.39.2-extended-rc2, list-abs/list-len uses [list length], which does not exist in 0.39 at all. It was introduced in 0.40. Therefore, list-len does not work.

(it would be good to look for other 0.40isms that were included in the backport of the list-abs to 0.39.2)

[Frank Barknecht]

Logged In: YES
user_id=569446
Originator: NO

Actually I have fixed this in the branch "branch-v0-39-2-extended" five days ago by reverting to a previous version, so it should be okay automatically fixed for the next pd-extended release.

Sorry for introducing this bug in the first place.

[Frank Barknecht]

Logged In: YES
user_id=569446
Originator: NO

Additional note: I found out, that last week I forgot to check in a similar fix for another patch that was using [list length]: list-compare.pd The 0.39 version is checked in now.

Should I close this bug or would you prefer to keep it open until pd-ext rc3/final?

[stffn]

Logged In: YES
user_id=1658640
Originator: NO

Both list-len and list-compare work here in RC3.

(os x.4.9, macbook core duo)

[Frank Barknecht]

Logged In: YES
user_id=569446
Originator: NO

Thanks for testing, stffn.

Then it's fixed in pd-ext RC3 on all platforms, as it's just about abstractions.