Re: [pupnp-devel] Info about UPnP Technologies license terms

[Nektarios K. P. <npa...@in...>]

Andrea Riccardo PALMIERI wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I and my work team have been involved in the implementation of specific 
> UPnP compliant applications (control points and devices). The final 
> objective of our activity is the development of licensed products. So 
> far, most of the implementation has been done using the Device Builder 
> authoring tools provided by Intel. Therefore, it would not be 
> straightforward for us to change the SDK and to use the portable 
> libupnp, because in this case we should rewrite the code.
> But, a problem arises in understanding the restrictions on what we can 
> do with source code derived from Device Builder.
> We know that libupnp is distributed under the BSD license. On the other 
> hand, it is not clear the license terms imposed by Intel.
> Do you know which kind of implications or restrictions are there when 
> using Intel source code? Are we subject to any form of license payment?
> 
I'm not a layer and could not figure this out myself when I read the 
license of DeviceBuilder.
I guess you may have better chance asking this question to Intel 
authoring tools related fora/lists.

Additional this is a members only list for people wishing to 
discuss/contribute to the development of libupnp.

There is another list for *developers using* the library:
pup...@li...

> Thanks in advance,
> Andrea
> 
> 

-- 
______________________________________________________________
Nektarios K. Papadopoulos
Senior Engineer
Software Engineering Group
inAccess Networks
______________________________________________________________