ptpd 2.3.1 support PHC

[CK]

Hi,
I refer to the ptpd-dpaa-etsec-v2.patch to implement the support of PHC in
ptpd 2.3.1 but got the unfortunate result. Does anyone help to see where
the mistake is?
Here is my diff file, Thanks.

[Wojciech Owczarek]

What does "unfortunate result" mean? It does not compile? The patch does not apply? Patches are made for a specific version of the source, changes refer to specific line numbers - a patch from a different version is bound not to apply cleanly. Just go through the patch line by line, find the right places and change the source manually.

[CK]

sorry for the implicit report.
This is my output after patch

master:
2015-09-17 17:43:33.233533, init,
2015-09-17 17:43:33.389863 ptpd2[5032].eth0 (notice) (lstn_init) Now in state: PTP_LISTENING
2015-09-17 17:43:33.391326, lstn_init, 1
2015-09-17 17:43:43.233011 ptpd2[5032].eth0 (notice) (lstn_init) TimingService.PTP0: elected best TimingService
2015-09-17 17:43:43.233177 ptpd2[5032].eth0 (info) (lstn_init) TimingService.PTP0: acquired clock control
2015-09-17 17:43:45.390858 ptpd2[5032].eth0 (notice) (mst) Now in state: PTP_MASTER, Best master: 000102fffe030464(unknown)/1 (self)
2015-09-17 17:43:45.391044, mst, 000102fffe030464(unknown)/1
recvmsg err
recvmsg err
recvmsg err
recvmsg err

slave:
1970-01-01 08:00:00.000000, init,
2015-09-17 19:07:37.689241 ptpd2[1743].eth0 (info) (init) Observed_drift loaded from kernel: 0 ppb
2015-09-17 19:07:37.801397 ptpd2[1743].eth0 (notice) (lstn_init) Now in state: PTP_LISTENING
2015-09-17 19:07:37.802989, lstn_init, 1
2015-09-17 19:07:39.167847 ptpd2[1743].eth0 (info) (lstn_init) New best master selected: 000102fffe030464(unknown)/1
2015-09-17 19:07:39.169346 ptpd2[1743].eth0 (notice) (slv) Now in state: PTP_SLAVE, Best master: 000102fffe030464(unknown)/1 (IPv4:10.102.11.100)
2015-09-17 19:07:39.170855, slv, 000102fffe030464(unknown)/1, 0.000000000, 0.000000000, 0.000000000, 0.000000000, 0.000000000, I, 0.000000000, 0, 0.000000000, 0, 0, 0, 0.000000000, 0.000000000
2015-09-17 19:07:39.253163 ptpd2[1743].eth0 (notice) (slv) Received first Sync from Master
2015-09-17 19:07:39.295999, slv, 000102fffe030464(unknown)/1, 0.000000000, 0.001656968, 0.000000000, 0.003313936, 0.000000000, S, 0.000000000, 0, 0.000000000, 0, 0, 0, 0.003313936, 0.000000000
2015-09-17 19:07:40.224994, slv, 000102fffe030464(unknown)/1, 0.000000000, 0.003338763, 0.000000000, 0.003363590, 0.000000000, S, 0.000000000, 0, 0.000000000, 0, 0, 0, 0.003363590, 0.000000000
recvmsg err
recvmsg err
2015-09-17 19:07:40.740977, slv, 000102fffe030464(unknown)/1, 0.000000000, 0.003338763, -0.003399604, 0.003363590, 3338.763000000, D, 0.000000000, 0, 0.000000000, 0, 0, 0, 0.003363590, -0.003399604
2015-09-17 19:07:40.741669 ptpd2[1743].eth0 (notice) (slv) Received first Delay Response from Master
2015-09-17 19:07:41.274756, slv, 000102fffe030464(unknown)/1, 0.000000000, 0.003400116, -0.003399604, 0.003436643, 3338.763000000, S, 0.000000000, 0, 0.000000000, 0, 0, 0, 0.003436643, -0.003399604
recvmsg err
2015-09-17 19:07:42.143885, slv, 000102fffe030464(unknown)/1, 0.000000000, 0.003400116, -0.003485581, 0.003436643, 6738.879000000, D, 0.000000000, 0, 0.000000000, 0, 0, 0, 0.003436643, -0.003485581
2015-09-17 19:07:42.251102, slv, 000102fffe030464(unknown)/1, 0.000000000, 0.003466486, -0.003485581, 0.003496330, 6738.879000000, S, 0.000000000, 0, 0.000000000, 0, 0, 0, 0.003496330, -0.003485581
recvmsg err
2015-09-17 19:07:42.686030, slv, 000102fffe030464(unknown)/1, 0.000000000, 0.003466486, -0.003516378, 0.003496330, 10205.365000000, D, 0.000000000, 0, 0.000000000, 0, 0, 0, 0.003496330, -0.003516378
2015-09-17 19:07:43.275338, slv, 000102fffe030464(unknown)/1, 0.000000000, 0.003527692, -0.003516378, 0.003559054, 10205.365000000, S, 0.000000000, 0, 0.000000000, 0, 0, 0, 0.003559054, -0.003516378
recvmsg err
recvmsg err

'recvmsg err' is error message from recvmsg() in function netRecvEvent.

And then, if everyting is ok, how to prove the offset caculated by hardware timestamp?
just see the value of 'offset from master' or 'Observed Drift' whether it is minimum and stable?

Thanks.