Re: [Proxool-developer] CGLIB 2

[Christian N. <chr...@em...>]

Soooo....

Lets aim for this optimal seqence of releases (all from HEAD):

0.8.2 - Bugfix
0.8.3 - CGLIB 2
0.9   - DataSource (++?)

I'll keep the DataSource stuff locally until after 0.8.3.

If the CGLIB 2 stuff proves to be a blocker for 0.9 we will review the problem. Aiight?


CHR

----- Original Message -----
From: Bill Horsman <bi...@lo...>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 09:54:54 +0000
To: Christian Nedregaard <chr...@em...>
Subject: Re: [Proxool-developer] CGLIB 2

> > Why dont we just aim for this sequence of releases in HEAD:
> > 
> > 0.8.3 - bugfix
> > 0.8.4 - CGLIB 2
> > 0.9   - DataSource (++?)
> 
> First of all, I made a mistake. The bug fix release will be 0.8.2.
> 
> The only reason I hesitate about releasing 0.8.4 (er, I mean 0.8.3)
> before 0.9.0 is it means we can't release our DataSource code until
> cglib2 is released. I don't like that loss of control. Let me talk to 
> Chris at cglib and see what he thinks about timing.
> 
> > 1) We will have to make our branch from the v0-8-2 tag. This is
> > confusing. Normal procedure would have been to create a bugfix branch
> > on the v0-8 release.
> 
> Er, we could still do that right? But it would then be very wise to
> merge in the bug fixes from 0.8.1/2. 
> 
> > 2) Branching in general leads to confusion. People tend to forget wich
> > branch they work in, forget to merge etc. etc.
> 
> Tell me about it. If we can avoid it, then fine.
> 
> > We will need a branch if you need to checkin unfinished CGLIB 2 stuff
> > before the 0.8.3 release.
> 
> That can be avoided. 0.8.3 (er, I mean 0.8.2) will definitely be before
> cglib2 is released. Probably.
> 
> [snip]
> > cvs rtag -b -r v0-8-2 v0-8-2-PATCH proxool
> [snip]
> > 1) Tag the merge point:
> > cvs -q rtag -F -r v0-8-2-PATCH v0-8-2-PATCH-MERGED proxool 
> > 
> > 2) Merge in from the "v0-8-2-PATCH" branch to HEAD:
> > cvs update -d -j v0-8-2-PATCH
> 
> Thanks for clarifying that. Merging scares me :)
> 
> > We don't need a separate branch for the CGLIB stuff if I hold my
> > DataSource checkins right? Alternatively I can keep it in the sandbox.
> 
> I think you might run into problems with keeping it in the sandbox.
> You'll need to reference it in ProxoolFacade, I would think. I can't
> think of a nice way round that.
> 
> Cheers,
> Bill
> 
> P.S. I'm very excited about the DataSource code :)
> 

-- 
__________________________________________________________
Sign-up for your own personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup

CareerBuilder.com has over 400,000 jobs. Be smarter about your job search
http://corp.mail.com/careers