From: Paul R B. <pbr...@nd...> - 2007-02-04 00:42:58
|
I agree. I'll look into the best fall back options. Scott already setup configure.in to search for machine native lapack libraries. I think the function calls currently in the source are specific to slight modifications to the API specific to SimTKlapack. I'll check on this and resolve conflicts. Most of the linux distributions seem to have some version of lapack in place. For Windows I'll do some looking. I sent an email to the SimTKlapack fellows regarding the availability of some static libraries and if they are willing to oblige they will be the recommended for Windows and Unix however not included with the ProtoMol source. -- Paul R Brenner, P.E. Computer Science and Engineering The University of Notre Dame "Computers are incredibly fast, accurate, and stupid; humans are incredibly slow, inaccurate and brilliant; together they are powerful beyond imagination." -Albert Einstein Quoting Jesus Izaguirre <iza...@st...>: > fine with me - this is probably best > Quoting Thierry Matthey <tm...@sc...>: > > > Hi, > > > > I support 100% Scott. Do it like FFTW, no include, but configure with > > fall back. > > > > -Thierry > > > > > |