Re: [Proftpd-devel] Logging "magic cookies"

[TJ S. <tj...@ca...>]

jwm>On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 12:43:22PM -0700, TJ Saunders wrote:
jwm>%   http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1644
jwm>
jwm>I'd like to see this; I think it's useful if you're running a bunch of
jwm>virtualhosts.

Should the suggested %H cookie be dependent on the configuration of
UseReverseDNS?

jwm>% Are there strong feelings one way or the other on the introduction of
jwm>% %d/%d (Bug#1605), and the consequent removal of %F as not needed?
jwm>
jwm>I'd like to see this, but if you're going to do it, do it before the next
jwm>release happens (and %F goes in). That way people can't start using %F and
jwm>complain when it's gone. :-)

Well, that's just it -- %F is in the code now, and the introduction of
%D/%d would make it...obsolete, and thus it would be removed.  This has
the disadvantage of making some configurations break, which is why I
hesitate.  If the introduction of %D/%d is deemed useful enough, though...

TJ

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

   Read not to contradict and confute, nor to believe and take for granted, nor
   to find talk and discourse, but to weigh and consider.

   	-Francis Bacon

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~