#2 overflow in timer

[G. Jones]

In version 0.90 RNG_test i'm seeing "time=" flipping to negative somewhere between half an hour and just over one hour. I guess this could be storing microseconds in a 32 bit signed int.

Yeah, it's fixed for 0.91. libc clocks are apparently dramatically faster on some platforms than the usual 18.2 to 1000 per second I'm used to.

Yeah, it's fixed for 0.91. It's storing libc ticks in ints and tick_t, and
some platforms have tick rates much higher than expected.

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:09 AM, G. Jones geronimojones@users.sf.netwrote:

---

• [bugs:#2] http://sourceforge.net/p/pracrand/bugs/2/ overflow in timer*

Status: open
Created: Tue Sep 24, 2013 12:09 PM UTC by G. Jones
Last Updated: Tue Sep 24, 2013 12:09 PM UTC
Owner: nobody

In version 0.90 RNG_test i'm seeing "time=" flipping to negative somewhere
between half an hour and just over one hour. I guess this could be storing
microseconds in a 32 bit signed int.

---

Sent from sourceforge.net because you indicated interest in
https://sourceforge.net/p/pracrand/bugs/2/

To unsubscribe from further messages, please visit
https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions/