From: Glenn Randers-P. <gl...@gm...> - 2011-03-12 20:54:54
|
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Glenn Randers-Pehrson <gl...@gm...> wrote: > > One of the unresolved bugs in ImageMagick is > 1. start with a TIF that defines 300dpi > 2. convert it to PNG. Now it has 11811 pixels/meter > So far, so good. > 3. Convert the PNG to another PNG. > Somehow it remembered the orginal figure 300 > in a text chunk containing Exif data or 8bim > data or something, but it did not remember > the new units. > So now it has 30000 pixels/meter. Oops. > 4. Convert the second PNG to a third PNG. > It still has 300000 pixels/meter, so I guess 30,000 > it could be worse. Incidentally GraphicsMagick is also wrong but differently and only insignificantly but a bit weirdly. The TIF has 300dpi The first PNG has 11811 pixels/meter The second PNG has 11810 pixels/meter The third PNG has 11809 pixels/meter. As far as I can tell the error stops increasing after that (I only ran a couple more). |