Re: [Plplot-devel] Re: Tweaked ltdl.c -> new tarball

[<jc...@fe...>]

On Friday 28 March 2003 04:37, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
| A netbsd update.
...

| *************
| Side Linux issue for Joao.  netbsd seemed fine for octave 2.1. 
| However, when I first attempted the comparison on the Linux side,
| octave 2.0 bombed with
|
| ./plplot-test.sh --front-end=octave
| warning: Setting 'automatic_replot' to 1

This is not up to date. Currently I don't set automatic replot, instead 
I recommend setting it.

| Opened p1.ps
| Opened p2.ps
| Opened p3.ps
| Opened p4.ps
| error: value on right hand side of assignment is undefined
| error: evaluating assignment expression near line 23, column 6
| error: called from p4' in file
| /usr/local/plplot_at/lib/plplot5.2.0.cvs.20030321/data/../examples/oc
|tave/p4.m'

This is also odd, as "grid" returns the current grid state.

Perhaps the snapshot were made in the middle of some of my changes?
Aren't you using "make dist"? I'm using it to generate a tarball for 
testing under OSF/1. I can now do it because I'm now able to generate 
the docs from docbook, thanks to Rafael help.

| I have since switched to octave 2.1.35 for Debian, and all is well in
| that case, and I don't intend to switch back.  However, Joao, if you
| still want your efforts to work for 2.0, then there is some
| maintenance work you have to do.

Actually my default octave is now 2.0.17, so I test everything with it. 
So, please keeping using 2.1.xx so we can keep plplot_octave compatible 
with both Octave versions.

BTW, have to tried to "compile" in the bsd machine the hello.cc file I 
send the other day? I'm curious.

Thanks,
Joao