Re: [Plplot-devel] Re: [Plplot-general] libqhull

[Joao C. <jc...@fe...>]

On Friday 14 March 2003 21:18, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> > * Alan W. Irwin <ir...@be...> [2003-03-14 09:26]:
> > > On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> > > > Long answer: This is a bad side-effect of using plplot_libtool,
> > > > instead of a full-fledged solution with the right libraries put in
> > > > the Makefile.
> > >
> > > NO.  You keep forgetting that libtool is a configured script that is
> > > adjusted exactly (and only) for the build system.  See below.
> >
> > Yes, this ideal situation only happens when the user build himself both
> > libqhull and libplplot in the same system and never removed the
> > libqhull.la file.
>
> No.  Joao's, your, and my systems are the counter-examples here.  None of
> us (I assume) built libqhull.

I dont know what you are talking about, but I had to build qhull from source.
Of course this is no argument to none of you, Alan and Rafael, because qhull 
"configure" was written by Rafael :)

Joao