From: Joao C. <jc...@fe...> - 2003-03-04 19:22:12
|
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 03:21, Joao Cardoso wrote: > On Tuesday 04 March 2003 01:13, Joao Cardoso wrote: > > On Monday 03 March 2003 23:52, Alan W. Irwin wrote: > > > On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > > > > * Joao Cardoso <jc...@fe...> [2003-03-03 20:53]: > > > > > After a fresh cvs checkout, running bootstrap.sh > > ... > > > I don't want to make a distro, just be able to quickly test on anothe= r > > architecture (I'm concerned with NaN stuff in nn/csa/plgridd.c). > > As I was afraid, under OSF1-V4.0 libcsa has trouble because of NaNs. li= bnn > must have the same problem. > > I ended up trying libcsa with its own test programs, but they fail, and= I > trace the problem down to NaNs handling > > It is increadible how ieee-754 is still "vendor dependent"! Cray is kno= w to > be not conformant, but OSF... I add some logic in sysloc.in to add the correct CFLAGS when compiling on= a=20 alpha/OSF -- please check it, it occurred to me just now that I did it th= e=20 wrong way, as the problem is not only related with the hardware but also = with=20 the OS. I *think* that linux running in an alpha might not have the probl= em,=20 I'm not sure. It would be nice if you guys with non-linux system could test this new co= de.=20 After the normal configure/make/install, try examples/x21c and report bac= k Thanks, Joao |