From: Rafael L. <lab...@ps...> - 2003-01-27 08:50:51
|
* Alan W. Irwin <ir...@be...> [2003-01-26 22:35]: > One question that springs to mind is why do we have all the device #define's > both in plConfig.h and PlDevs.h? Could we just drop plDevs.h altogether (at > least for Linux/Unix systems) and use only plConfig.h? That would require > some big but straightforward changes to our hierarchy of PLplot includes, > but I think it would work. > > Alternatively, if we really want PlDevs.h created separately, then somebody > has to figure out the autoconf commands to process Pldevs.h.in into PlDevs.h > properly without using the AM_CONFIG_HEADER macro (which would run you into > the date problems which started this thread). This is a very serious bug and I will try to find some time tonight to try to find a decent solution. I agree with Alan that this must be fixed properly. Workarounds today will only result on headaches tomorrow. I think that if/when this bug is fixed, a new 5.2.1 tarball will have to be released. -- Rafael |