From: Alan W. I. <ir...@be...> - 2002-11-09 17:10:34
|
On Sat, 9 Nov 2002, Maurice LeBrun wrote: > p.s. as far as allowing a nx(j) or ny(i) dependence, I have no idea. Never > thought about it before, and after a quick look at the code I'm not hopeful > that there's an easy way to support it. I haven't looked at the code in detail, but I am just going on the documentation here. All pltr2 seems to do is interpolate (with boundary checks). So shouldn't it be straightforward to make variations on pltr2 that accept and use a PLPointer which includes either the nx(j) information or ny(i) information? I realize that such variations are not all that needs to be done by a long shot, but if these fundamental bits are possible, then I think the rest should be straightforward for all 3D API's that currently reference an interpolater such as pltr2. Alan |