From: Vince D. <vi...@sa...> - 2002-07-25 08:29:28
|
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, [iso-8859-1] Jo=E3o Cardoso wrote: > Yes, it looks like tkwin needs the definition of a internal structure. >=20 > Vince, that is only needed once in the tkwin code, can't it be done=20 > using some tk utility function? I don't believe so. I'll take another look, however. > Another issue: I dont like the name tkwin for the new driver: we=20 > already have a tk driver and a xwin driver. As the tkwin driver main=20 > purpose is to be cross platform capable, couldn't it be called tkx? or=20 > xtk? or tkall? The directory name in the bindings directory is already=20 > called tk-x-plat... I don't like anything like 'tkx' because that sounds like it is 'tk on X windows' which it is explicitly *not* (that is what the old 'tk' driver is). If anything we should rename 'tk' to 'tkx' and take 'tk' for the new driver *grin*. Vince. |