From: Alan W. I. <ir...@be...> - 2002-07-16 16:45:27
|
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Vince Darley wrote: > Actually I can't really see what could be going wrong... may have to leave > this up to Geoff etc to look at. However I will continue to think. > > I the long term it would be much better to get rid of the compiled > executable that is plserver and replace it with an executable Tcl script > which simply loads dlls etc. We'll cross that bridge when we come to it. But the flip side of this is that on any time scale less than long term we have to continue to support plserver and pltcl. I expect the problem is caused because pltcl is set up correctly to do the tcl_findLibrary search and plserver not. Could you please try similar temporary tclAPI.c coding tricks there so that both searches fail, and we can look at the tcl_findLibrary error messages from both plserver and pltcl? Are they the same or fundamentally different as in the case on Linux? Alan |