From: Vince D. <vi...@sa...> - 2002-07-02 15:23:55
|
>>> Under Linux/Unix whatever line-ending style is in cvs is checked out that way and not converted and similarly on check-in. I wasn't sure what happened on windows, but I noticed in the past that some of the files in the windows area were a horrible mixture of the two styles so I made the decision to convert them to a consistent (windows) style. I notice on all your many recent check-ins that you are using a Linux line ending style. I really appreciate that for the core parts, but you don't need to extend that to sys/win-tk/ if it is an extra burden for you there. >>> No extra burden at all. In fact it would be a burden (and a bad idea, I _think_) to do differently. All the text files (including all of those ones which you see as '\n') have \r\n on my machine, so when I checked everything in, I didn't have to do anything special at all, because cvs converted that to \n on the fly. The only problems arise because: (i) processing of files (e.g. by perl) assumes a particular line-ending style. (I would call this a bug in the perl script) (ii) files aren't binary when they should be (e.g. lib/*.fnt) Anyway, these are the lessons I've picked up from developing Tcl, which I think should also apply to plplot, but also feel free to ignore them if they seem wrong. The most important one is (ii) because plplot will 100% guaranteed segfault at the moment, which isn't very helpful! cheers, -- Vince <http://www.santafe.edu/~vince> |