From: Maurice L. <mj...@ga...> - 2002-03-15 07:50:38
|
Maurice LeBrun writes: > I'm wondering if this is something that's amenable to a flex/yacc treatment. > If so a flex/yacc expert could probably whip something out in a few days, and > we'd just need to add the underlying support routines for doing the actual > plots. That way we could support gnuplot "natively" through a new set of > bindings. Eventually adding plplot-specific enhancements, of course. BTW I think of this as a "binding" because it does (barely) fit into the paradigm of a mapping from some arbitrary API onto plplot core intrinsics. Each binding we have is a thoroughly independent beast, although we try to make the API's similar. In this case, we don't. :) And as a binding, it would eventually come with a set of example programs that reproduce the current example set. Using the "PLplot command superset" as necessary.. Sounds like a pretty cool project. -- Maurice LeBrun mj...@ga... |