From: Rafael L. <lab...@mp...> - 2002-02-09 01:44:20
|
* Maurice LeBrun <mj...@ga...> [2002-02-08 04:38]: > Speaking of long term projects, did anyone catch the recent LJ article = on > "Subversion"? It's a CVS-replacement project, aimed at fixing all the > irritating deficiencies of CVS as well as desuckifying the code base, w= hile > basically preserving the existing API. I got seriously pumped reading = about > it. >=20 > Here's the LJ article: > http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=3D4768 >=20 > Well worth a read. The Subversion home page is at: > http://subversion.tigris.org/ Yes, subversion looks quite promising. I have been using since three years now another version control system called PRCS (http://prcs.sf.net). I am also the Debian package maintaine= r for PRCS. I use it for all my personal projects. PRCS is considered the most =EFntellectual"version control system around. Its simplicity, elegance, and power are simply unbelievable. Unfortunately, that clumsy piece of software called CVS dominated the wor= ld, just because PRCS did not get the momentum it deserved. PRCS has been essentially a one-man effort, namely Josh MacDonald (also from GTK and XDelta fame), who never got to release the long-awaited PRCS2, which has client/server support. Without handling remote repositories, PRCS is no viable alternative to CVS in a distributed development environment. At any rate, I think that Subversion is making its path into world domination. Although I have a penchant for PRCS, I think that anything t= hat makes CVS disappear from Earth is a Good Thing. -- Rafael P.S.: Did I tell you that I *hate* CVS? Preventing files from being properly renamed and deleted, among other stupidities, is simply unacceptable for a version control system. P.S.(2): For the lucky Debian users: $ apt-get install prcs And then look at /usr/share/doc/prcs/prcs-tutorial.html |