From: Rafael L. <lab...@mp...> - 2002-02-07 08:46:42
|
* Maurice LeBrun <mj...@ga...> [2002-02-06 21:56]: > I'm a bit skeptical it would have made a big difference. It seems to me > that with the addition of dyndrivers, there were going to be a lot of > configuration changes regardless of which configuration model we were > using. I do not remember if I told you guys about this, but in my private AM/LT branch (not in CVS) I started porting the dyndrv code to libltdl, a portable library for manipulating dynamically loaded objects (see http://www.gnu.org/manual/libtool-1.4.2/html_node/libtool_45.html). The goal is to make the dyndrv code largely portable across platforms. By no means, using libltdl means using libtool, but the two things work nice together. > Certainly the commits I made personally left me with that impression. I > don't mean to be throwing water on your enthusiasm, I just think it will > take a while for the payoff from AM/LT (or dyndrivers for that matter) to > be really evident. The payoff from cool new features, however, can be > immediate. I also think that AM/LT will not bring anything visible for the end-user. My interest in AM/LT is from the packager point of view. Believe me, the current configuration can be a nightmare for people packaging PLplot (witness rpath problems, non-relocatability, etc). Besides that, integrating the TEA stuff may be an easier task in the framework of AM/LT. I also think that making the configuration scheme more "modern" (yeah, in the GNU sense...) will make it much more attractive for the potential future developers joining our team. > Yeah, I'd feel the most comfortable if the effort were led by Rafael. > Hopefully no time real soon so I can get some other work done. :) No doubt, I am the most entitled person to do the job. Unfortunately, I have this time budget problem right now. At any rate, I did not resign from the project yet, but if I see that I cannot do anything to improve the situation, I will have to make a decision. I will tell you when/if this arrive (I hope not). -- Rafael |