Re: [Plplot-devel] Release Status -- Still looking good for Thursday

[Alan W. I. <ir...@be...>]

On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, [iso-8859-1] Jo=E3o Cardoso wrote:

> No, I concluded that the cvs version is more stable than my current
> version.

OK.

>
> | Could somebody please volunteer to do a final comprehensive check
> | that the C code is ansi-compliant?  This would take some release
> | burden off me.  (I think I can recall how to check it, but if there
> | are warnings, I wouldn't know how to fix up the problems except for
> | the // commentary that screws up the Slowaris compiler.)
>
> I'm afraid that tk.c, around line 1229, uses some POSIX, non-ansi
> system calls, such as sigemptyset(), sigaddset() and sigprocmask().
> It's only purpose is to "Don't kill plserver on a ^C if
> pls->server_nokill is set", and can safely be conditionaly compiled
> within a #ifndef  __STRICT_ANSI__/#endif block. I don't commit this
> as I'm no ansi/posix expert, and it might be gcc (linux) specific.
>
> All other source files compiled OK, except for two warnings in
> plframe.c. It looks like that fdopen() and fileno() are not ansi
> compliant?

Thanks very much for that comprehensive check.  I am particularly glad ther=
e
are no // commentary issues this time.  Could a C expert here deal with the
remaining non-ANSI problems that Joao has found?

Alan