From: Maurice L. <mj...@ga...> - 2002-01-18 09:36:16
|
Maurice LeBrun writes: > Alan W. Irwin writes: > > I don't care that much about version numbers except that I don't want to go > > through them too rapidly. My understanding is the major number should be > > incremented for huge changes, the minor number should be incremented for > > fairly large changes, and the patch number incremented for smaller changes. > > I absolutely agree with you there have been some fairly large changes made > > since 5.0.4. Thus, I assumed it was appropriate to increment the minor > > number and move on to 5.1.0. But if the developers here feel that 5.0.5 is > > more appropriate, that is certainly fine with me! > > I think that 5.1.0 is a fine choice. One question -- will dyndrivers be turned on by default? Right now it's not. -- Maurice LeBrun mj...@ga... |