From: Maurice L. <mj...@ga...> - 2002-01-18 08:46:46
|
Alan W. Irwin writes: > I don't care that much about version numbers except that I don't want to go > through them too rapidly. My understanding is the major number should be > incremented for huge changes, the minor number should be incremented for > fairly large changes, and the patch number incremented for smaller changes. > I absolutely agree with you there have been some fairly large changes made > since 5.0.4. Thus, I assumed it was appropriate to increment the minor > number and move on to 5.1.0. But if the developers here feel that 5.0.5 is > more appropriate, that is certainly fine with me! I think that 5.1.0 is a fine choice. -- Maurice LeBrun mj...@ga... |