From: Maurice L. <mj...@ga...> - 2001-12-26 23:34:02
|
Alan W. Irwin writes: > Will it confuse cvs if I remove the 3 generated files from cvs control, but > then change my mind later and want to put them under cvs control again? Sadly, yes. I've never been able to resurrect dead files without directly modifying the repository. I just tried now on a test file / test repository and still it doesn't work through the API. > If changing my mind is no problem to cvs (meaning I can always go back if > there is a storm of protest), then I think the right thing to do is to treat > these generated files the same way we do the configure script; exclude them > from cvs control but generate them for the tarball release. This only puts > the onus on those of us here on the developer's list (and perhaps a few > more) that are building from CVS to be sure that they have perl. I don't see any problem with this. Previously, it was leaving the generated files out of the public distribution that caused all the trouble. > Any objections to having perl on your machine from the developers here? I doubt there'll be any objections. And as far as availability goes, IIRC perl's even available under Windows. -- Maurice LeBrun mj...@ga... |