From: Joao C. <jca...@in...> - 2001-11-30 20:19:31
|
On Friday 30 November 2001 20:12, Maurice LeBrun wrote: | Alan W. Irwin writes: | > I agree with the important distinction that Geoffrey has drawn betwe= en | > simple demos and extended examples that may include dependencies on | > non-plplot libraries. And I agree with having the latter in a separ= ate | > directory. However, I don't like the name contrib/example because th= e | > implication of "contrib" is it was contributed from outside the plpl= ot | > group, and we don't maintain it or have anything to do with it. So t= he | > name I propose is plplot/extended_examples, instead. I don't think w= e | > are going to have a lot of extended examples so I propose *not* to | > divide up plplot/extended_examples into various sub-directories for = each | > of the front-ends like plplot/examples is divided up at the present | > moment. | | I greatly prefer plplot/examples/extended or something like that. | | > Directory and file names are always a pain to change in CVS so I wil= l | > give you a chance to think about the name I have proposed and the fl= at | > directory structure below it before I commit anything to CVS tomorro= w. | | Good idea. That's OK for me. Anyway, it is difficult to antecipate what kind of=20 subdirectories will be needed. Of course, if the directory becomes crowed, what I don't think will happe= n,=20 it is always possible to move files to subdirectories, as long as the cvs= =20 history is not important, which I don't think will be the case with this = kind=20 of source code. Joao |