From: Maurice L. <mj...@ga...> - 2001-11-30 05:11:20
|
Jo=E3o Cardoso writes: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > While working on x20c.c, I noticed that plxormod() should return a=20= > status, saying that the device is or is not capable of such=20 > operation. The user code would then conditionaly execute code that=20= > uses or not xor mode. > The change, to be usefull, would imply also minor changes in xwin.c=20= > and tk.c, adding a device option has_xormod, but this is transparent= =20 > to the user (all is ready for commit). >=20 > This will break compatibility with previous releases of plplot. What= =20 > do you think? I think that plxormod() is not widely used, so there=20= > should be no problems for most users. Go for it. --=20 Maurice LeBrun mj...@ga... |