From: Alan W. I. <ir...@be...> - 2017-10-06 18:06:10
|
On 2017-10-06 11:00+0100 Phil Rosenberg wrote: > Given that the libraries in question are in the standard c and C++ > libraries. I just tested to see what the impact is of simply > commenting out the checks for these two libraries. > > The result is that wingcc is accepted onto the driver list, appears in > my plplot VC++ project, everything builds correctly and I can run the > examples and select the wingcc device and everything runs fine. > > Given that this is the case is there even a need to check for these > libraries? Or is this test needed for Cygwin or minGW builds? The present library finding has "just worked" for a long time for a large variety of Windows users on many different Windows platforms so I am somewhat reluctant to change it. On the other hand, I guess it is possible if you don't need it, then nobody needs it, but I am not at all sure about that. So before making any decisions here, I think we need to collect more information. For example, I would like you to try 3.9.4 (see other thread concerning CMake versions) to see if this particular problem persists (and also to determine whether CMake-3.9.4 satisfies all PLplot build-system needs for your Windows SDK version.) Alan __________________________ Alan W. Irwin Astronomical research affiliation with Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria (astrowww.phys.uvic.ca). Programming affiliations with the FreeEOS equation-of-state implementation for stellar interiors (freeeos.sf.net); the Time Ephemerides project (timeephem.sf.net); PLplot scientific plotting software package (plplot.sf.net); the libLASi project (unifont.org/lasi); the Loads of Linux Links project (loll.sf.net); and the Linux Brochure Project (lbproject.sf.net). __________________________ Linux-powered Science __________________________ |