From: Arjen M. <Arj...@de...> - 2016-03-03 07:44:58
|
Hi Alan, > -----Original Message----- > From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@be...] > Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:26 PM > To: Arjen Markus > Cc: PLplot development list > Subject: RE: [Plplot-devel] Deprecation of the MinGW/MSYS platform > > Hi Arjen: > > Sorry, I did not state what I meant very clearly. There is no doubt that distributions > of free software such as Cygwin and MinGW-w64/MSYS2 provide free libraries that > are soft dependencies of PLplot such as the pthread, shapelib, and qhull libraries; > the Qt4 suite of libraries, the Pango/Cairo subset of the GTK+ suite of libraries, > wxWidgets, etc. Oh, I was not even thinking about these - I just saw the dependency and found it curious - it reminded me of Cygwin's DLLs. But the security issue is definitely an issue and more important than avoiding a single dependency somewhere. > > Therefore, I feel the proper way to deal with the inherent security issues for binary > distribution is to let official distributions of free software handle that headache. So I > am pleased that Orion is packaging PLplot for Fedora, Andrew is doing the same > thing on Debian (and indirectly on Debian derivatives such as Ubuntu). Similarly, > there are PLplot packaging efforts on most other Linux distributions, the principal > Mac OS X distributions Fink, MacPorts, and Homebrew, and also the principal > *BSD variants, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, and NetBSD. > > In contrast to that situation, my understanding is that both the Cygwin and MinGW- > w64/MSYS2 platforms do not currently distribute PLplot. To fix those important > issues we need someone with access to those two platforms to become a packager > for each of them. Would you be willing to take on those two additional important > roles? I think that would be a time-consuming effort to start for you, but after that > required initial burst of activity, I don't think it would take a major effort to maintain > the Cygwin and MinGW-w64/MSYS2 packages for PLplot going forward. > > If it turns out you are interested in becoming the PLplot packager for either/both > those distributions, I think the next steps would be to query the Cygwin and MSYS2 > mailing lists to find out exact details of how to become a packager of PLplot for > those two distributions. > Getting PLplot into the collections of packages managed by Cygwin and MSYS2 definitely seems worthwhile and would solve a problem that we have discussed every so often over the years. I have no idea though what amount of time is to be invested and what kind of work it involves. I can find out though - I happen to know a contributor ;). Regards, Arjen DISCLAIMER: This message is intended exclusively for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and destroy this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. The foundation 'Stichting Deltares', which has its seat at Delft, The Netherlands, Commercial Registration Number 41146461, is not liable in any way whatsoever for consequences and/or damages resulting from the improper, incomplete and untimely dispatch, receipt and/or content of this e-mail. |