From: Arjen M. <Arj...@de...> - 2015-05-15 10:15:25
|
Hi Alan, Hazen, -----Original Message----- > From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@be...] > Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 2:19 AM > > Hi Hazen: > > It turned out to be a fortran argument issue in Fortran example 29, where 0. had to > be replaced by 0._plflt (see commit id=a0e51cd). Actually, this should have been caught by the compiler. > > @Arjen: > This issue illustrates how tricky it is to use our current fortran bindings and should be > a big motivation for you to finish up your rewrite of those bindings so our Fortran > user's don't have to worry about using the _plflt suffix on all floating-point arguments. > Indeed, on the other hand, see my remark above. I will have a look at this. > @Hazen: Solving this plctime argument issue solved the floating point exception (as > you suggested it would) for fortran example 29 so I think the only floating-point > issues currently left are for examples > 21 and 33. > Any chance they are caused by something similar? Regards, Arjen DISCLAIMER: This message is intended exclusively for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and destroy this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. The foundation 'Stichting Deltares', which has its seat at Delft, The Netherlands, Commercial Registration Number 41146461, is not liable in any way whatsoever for consequences and/or damages resulting from the improper, incomplete and untimely dispatch, receipt and/or content of this e-mail. |