From: <jc...@fe...> - 2003-02-12 16:08:02
|
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 15:21, Christophe TROESTLER wrote: | On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Jo=E3o Cardoso <jc...@fe...> wrote: | > On Wednesday 12 February 2003 11:43, Christophe TROESTLER wrote: | > > P.S. BTW, the octave-plplot/README contains the following which | > > does not seem to be accurate anymore: | > | > Where did you saw that? I have changed it in April 2001! | | In the Debian =AB unstable =BB package source (file | octave-plplot-0.3.orig/README) ; see (download and send a mail to the | maitainer at): | | http://packages.debian.org/unstable/math/octave-plplot.html | | I thought it was up-to-date since the plplot packages are. Since plplot-5.0.3 (March 2001) that plplot_octave is integrated into=20 plplot. You should use the builtin version. Look in bindings/octave in=20 the source distribution. Rafael & David, does the debian octave-plplot-0.3 package still makes=20 sense? Specially if it is outdated? Thanks, Joao | | ChriS |