From: Alan W. I. <ir...@be...> - 2004-05-18 15:46:01
|
On 2004-05-18 22:05+1000 Andrew Roach wrote: > I agree with Rafael, and believe unicode is the way to go long term - it's > only an accident of 1980s 8 bit architecture we are stuck with ASCII's 256 > characters. Translating between the Hershey fonts, unicode, then finding > freetype compatible fonts with the symbols would be the interesting part of > the exercise. I also agree unicode is a worthwhile goal, and I hope you have time to look into it. If moving to unicode can be done in the short-term, then fixing the #(NNNN) approach becomes moot. But if unicode is going to be a long-term fix, then I hope you also look into the #(NNNN) approach to see if there is a simple fix to make it work with non-Hershey fonts. The short-term problem is there is currently no way to use more than the first 256 characters in any font file, and I don't want that to turn into a long-term problem. BTW, your recent cvs fix to change the 156 character limit to 256 works great. Thanks very much! But I also hope we can soon go through the 256 character limit as well. Alan __________________________ Alan W. Irwin email: ir...@be... phone: 250-727-2902 Astronomical research affiliation with Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria (astrowww.phys.uvic.ca). Programming affiliations with the PLplot scientific plotting software package (plplot.org), the Yorick front-end to PLplot (yplot.sf.net), the Loads of Linux Links project (loll.sf.net), and the Linux Brochure Project (lbproject.sf.net). __________________________ Linux-powered Science __________________________ |