Re: [Plone-docs] New roles in Plone 3.0

[Raphael R. <r....@bi...>]

shurik wrote:
> My very modest improvement proposal is to include the roles allowed to
> perform a transition in the transition's title. For example Manager, Editor,
> and Owner appear to be able to "hide" content in the "Community Workflow"
> "visible" state, but the transition is titled "Member makes content
> private". On one level the word "Member" is misleading, on another having
> the actual roles there helps make the transition really clear. 
> 

Hi Aleksandr,

I agree with you that the title is misleading, I'd even say it's
simply wrong. I suggest to not even put anything role/permission
related into the title itself because it shows up in the UI.
There (in the UI) you only get offered what you are allowed to
do anyways, so why not just say

    make private

and be done with it?

Do others have an opinion here?

Raphael


> 
> Raphael Ritz wrote:
>> shurik wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm documenting the new roles in Plone 3.0 at the Docsprint. I'd like to
>>> find out who the authors of the new workflow definitions are in order to
>>> clarify some questions and propose some improvements.
>>>
>> Well, it was at least drafted by Alex Limi, myself and some others
>> at the Archipelago spring last year (yeah that's more than one
>> year back by now ...). IIRC the implementation/port to GS was
>> mainly done by Martin.
>>
>> Feel free to bring up these issues here or on plone-devel
>> I'd say.
>>
>> Raphael
>>
>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Aleksandr
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
>> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
>> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
>> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Plone-docs mailing list
>> Plo...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-docs
>>
>>
>