From: Martin A. <opt...@gm...> - 2007-02-13 00:31:41
|
JoAnna Springsteen wrote: > +100 Martin :) > > I will volunteer to lead the effort to get the style/documentation > guide nailed down. Excellent :) > Since that's winding down, I want in on the process stuff as well when > I'm finished. Great. Like I said, I'd like to keep one person to one responsibility if possible to start off with, in the interest of seeing things finished and not overloading people. > As always, I'll help where ever I can if someone needs help or just > feedback. I've noticed we tend to get more progress made when we > bounce ideas off one another so I don't want that to diminish any. Yes, totally. In no way should these things be one-person efforts. In my experience, things work much better when they have a single person who "owns" the task and stakes their reputation (no pressure, just kidding) on getting it done. > On a side note: would it be possible to get a feature that would shoot > out an email to the plone-docs list when a document is submitted for > review? Would others find this helpful? Maybe we can include this with > the PHC work?? It'd be a pretty simple change to PHC. We can roll it in with other development. > A comment on the ratings bit: lets not go as simple as yes or no. You > can find and read a document that may not be helpful to your current > situation but it doesn't mean it's a bad document at all. (does that > make sense?) Maybe a 1-5 rating system? with little stars...oooh! no. > little plone logos!! heh. Yeah, we can do that. Sometimes, stars can be a bit abstract (is it five stars for quality or relevance or lack of overlap or humour?). Perhaps some more pointed questions? "Did this explain what you thought it was trying to explain well?", "Did the steps work?" that kind of thing? Martin |