From: Anthony G. <ant...@gm...> - 2011-04-27 08:25:19
|
We use Redmine http://www.redmine.org/ which supports multiple and nested projects. I like it a lot and more than JIRA or Trac On 27/04/2011 02:08, Martin Aspeli wrote: > Hi, > >> From time to time, we have "projects" - things like Diazo, Deco, > Dexterity, plone.app.caching, skin/theme unification, etc. - that are > bigger than one person and bigger than one package. > > I find it hard to do the design and "project management" around these > kind of things. Mostly, I'd like to be able to define a list of > deliverables that need completing (e.g. components, features, user > stories), have a way to group and prioritise them, and allow people to > take ownership over them. I'd also like some kind of visible progress > indicator. > > The best thing we have for this now is Trac, but Trac makes it hard to > find related tasks and doesn't have a great UI for planning and > prioritisation. Our big "plone" Track instance also tends to drown out > "projects" in a sea of bug reports. > > Does anyone have tools they'd like to recommend? Some options I can > think of are: > > - Etherpads with plain text to-do lists. > > Pros: Simple, full history, malleable > Cons: Too simple? Limited to what you can describe on one page of text > > - A new Trac instance per project > > Pros: Familiar tool, existing infrastructure > Cons: Still not great UI, management overhead of getting plone.org > admins to set one up > > - A single Trac instance for "projects", using the "component" field > to differentiate > > Pros: See previous > Cons: See previous > > - JIRA + GreenHopper, which is free for self-hosted open source > > Pros: Flexible and a lot more powerful than Trac; easy to create > projects within the instance > Cons: Not open source, overlaps a lot with Trac > > - Pivotal Tracker > > Pros: Simple, clean user interface, free for public projects > Cons: Model assumes sustained burst of activity, not ad-hoc work > > My vote would probably go to JIRA, just because I know it is powerful > enough (I use it at work), but it's a pretty big undertaking to set it > up. In the end, this stuff has no value unless people use it, though, > so the real question is: Would you be interested in something like > this? > > Cheers, > Martin > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software > The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network > management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial > acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd > _______________________________________________ > Plone-developers mailing list > Plo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers > |