From: Graham P. <G.J...@bt...> - 2008-11-23 15:18:56
|
Martin Aspeli-2 wrote: > > … to implement these plans … a huge job. … achievable goals. … > Martin, many thanks. I agree, it is (and may continue to be) a huge job, but I believe that the goals are achievable. Just one question. Where you say: > if readers stumble across something, this is where they should be > stumbling — please, can you elaborate on that thought? A Diigo-annotated view of <http://martinaspeli.net/articles/on-plone-documentation> includes highlights and sticky notes, and there's only one aspect that concerns me but as you say, it's > a mistake to try and solve all the problems with "Plone documentation" in > the same way and I in no way discourage the approaches that don't suit me :) (I confess, I haven't read the long threads in the forums … not that I'm disinterested, it's just a little too much to take in at the moment! And like Martin, I have a sense of déjà vu.) A closing thought: > … Barriers to entry should be low … Open the flood-gates … To both of those points, +1 but I suggest that we should visualise something closer to a *single* flood gate. I'll make my thoughts on this a separate thread. Regards Graham -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/A-few-suggestions-tp1567121p1568617.html Sent from the Documentation Team mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |