Re: [Plone-docs] Basic Use section comments

[Veda W. <ve...@on...>]

My comments next to >>.
> 
> I understand that we¹re moving away from PHC content types and going with just
> pages and folders. As such it seems like it¹s time to restructure the section
> accordingly. What I¹m thinking is to basically surface the Plone 3 manual to
> the top level of the Basic Use section so that you would see a list of topics
> like: Introduction, Adding Content, Managing Content, etc. Under each section
> would be the pages that relate to that section.
> 
>> Just to clarify, this is something Alexander Limi was talking about, there¹s
no action on this at this point, so we should proceed as though it won¹t happen.
It sounds like the topic headings you propose are logical in the current
context. 
> 
> What Documentation Should I Read and Asking for Help could be moved into a
> static portlet to the side. We may decide to do this another way eventutally,
> but I¹d like to work towards this for now.
> 
>> I don¹t think we have the ability to create new static portlets at this time
(eg SteveM¹s time), so we might have to table that item for now. But, I think it
plays directly into what Ricardo Newbery was talking about with highlighting
links to things like the Zope documentation and planet.plone. This is definitely
something we should look closer at ‹ showing links that would be helpful, but
only in the correct context.
>  
> I¹d really like to keep themeing and CSS stuff out of this section because I
> feel that ŒBasic Use for Content Editors¹ needs to be focused on non-technical
> users. The dividing line I usually use is if it has to be done through the
> ZMI, don¹t include it in content editor documentation. Also, this section
> should assume that the audience reading it doesn¹t know anything about TALES,
> Python, Zope, or even very much HTML.
> 
>> Agreed. These items should be un-tagged if they aren¹t directly relevant.
 
- Veda