From: Alec M. <ap...@co...> - 2006-06-25 15:07:36
|
On 6/24/06, Rob Miller <ra...@bu...> wrote: > Alec Mitchell wrote: > > Generally I think nocall: is preferable for this kind of usage (being > > more explicit and all). > > i thought about that, went with 'python:' because it seemed like it would most > exactly match the earlier semantics. > > anyway, it's generally a bad idea to treat a full object as a boolean, really > we should go back and use more specific checks (e.g. "python: member is not > None" instead of "python: member") even better! :-) Alec |